» Articles » PMID: 27751832

Safe and Optimal Pneumoperitoneal Pressure for Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Renal Surgery in Infant Less Than 10 kg, Looked Beyond Intraoperative Period: A Prospective Randomized Study

Overview
Journal J Pediatr Urol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Pediatrics
Urology
Date 2016 Oct 19
PMID 27751832
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A safe and optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure (PP) for laparoscopic renal surgery in infants is difficult to define. In a broad sense, a safe and optimal PP should cause least intraoperative and postoperative physiological stress for the infants and should be optimal for surgeon's technical feasibility. Unfortunately, the safe and optimal PP in infant for transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery has not been established by well validated study. To determine safe and optimal PP for laparoscopic renal surgery (LRS) in infants less than 10 kg.

Method: In a prospective and randomized setting, between July 2008 and June 2014, 46 infants of <10 kg (Group I, n = 23, PP = 6-8 mmHg and Group II, n = 23, PP = 9-10 mmHg) who underwent LRS, were analyzed. Hemodynamic, respiratory, and blood gas changes were measured at four points: before CO insufflation (T), 10 min after insufflation (T), before desufflation (T) and 10 min after desufflation (T). Any required adjustments of ventilator parameters were noted. Time to resume feeding and postoperative pain at 1, 6, and 12 h, including requirement for postoperative rescue analgesia, were assessed. Technical feasibility with allocated PP was evaluated by means of successful completion of surgery, duration of surgery, and intraoperative complications.

Results: At T and T, changes in hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were significantly higher in Group II. At T, most of the parameters statistically restored back to baseline in Group I but not so in Group II. Required adjustments in ventilatory parameters were 14 vs. 25 times in Group I vs. Group II (p = 0.007, R = 0.552). Mean postoperative pain score, requirement for analgesia, and time to resume feeding were significantly greater in Group II. Surgeries were successfully completed in all the patients in both groups, with comparable duration of surgery and similar intraoperative complications (Table).

Conclusion: It was found that hemodynamic and respiratory changes were more pronounced with higher pneumoperitoneal pressure in infants for renal laparoscopic surgery. With a PP of 6-8 mmHg, intraoperative accessibility is optimal, and physiological changes are minimal. Interestingly, we found that infants with PP of 6-8 mmHg enjoy smooth and early postoperative recovery. There was no direct objective criterion to assess level of difficulty with allocated PP, which may be considered a limitation of the present study. Pneumoperitoneal pressure of 6-8 mmHg appears to be a safe and optimal range for transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery in infants.

Citing Articles

Comparison of low and standard pneumoperitoneum pressure in laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair.

Chen L, Lyu Y Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024; 19(2):249-253.

PMID: 38973792 PMC: 11223542. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.138769.


Physiological and Anesthetic Considerations of Safe and Optimal Pneumoperitoneal Pressures for Laparoscopic Surgeries in Children.

Joon P, Mandelia A, Dhiraaj S, Singh T, Shamshery C, Mishra P J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024; 29(1):13-18.

PMID: 38405258 PMC: 10883174. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_87_23.


Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang M, Xi Y, Huang N, Wang P, Zhang L, Zhao M PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16468.

PMID: 38025670 PMC: 10666611. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16468.


Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.

Pillai Riddell R, Bucsea O, Shiff I, Chow C, Gennis H, Badovinac S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD006275.

PMID: 37314064 PMC: 10265939. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub4.


Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review.

Shen L, Tou J World J Pediatr Surg. 2022; 5(4):e000482.

PMID: 36474741 PMC: 9717356. DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000482.