» Articles » PMID: 27742740

Immunoseroproteomic Profiling in African American Men with Prostate Cancer: Evidence for an Autoantibody Response to Glycolysis and Plasminogen-Associated Proteins

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 16
PMID 27742740
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

African American (AA) men suffer from a disproportionately high incidence and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa) compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Despite these disparities, African American men are underrepresented in clinical trials and in studies on PCa biology and biomarker discovery. We used immunoseroproteomics to profile antitumor autoantibody responses in AA and European American (EA) men with PCa, and explored differences in these responses. This minimally invasive approach detects autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens that could serve as clinical biomarkers and immunotherapeutic agents. Sera from AA and EA men with PCa were probed by immunoblotting against PC3 cell proteins, with AA sera showing stronger immunoreactivity. Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoreactive protein spots revealed that several AA sera contained autoantibodies to a number of proteins associated with both the glycolysis and plasminogen pathways, particularly to alpha-enolase (ENO1). The proteomic data is deposited in ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD003968. Analysis of sera from 340 racially diverse men by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) showed higher frequency of anti-ENO1 autoantibodies in PCa sera compared with control sera. We observed differences between AA-PCa and EA-PCa patients in their immunoreactivity against ENO1. Although EA-PCa sera reacted with higher frequency against purified ENO1 in ELISA and recognized by immunoblotting the endogenous cellular ENO1 across a panel of prostate cell lines, AA-PCa sera reacted weakly against this protein by ELISA but recognized it by immunoblotting preferentially in metastatic cell lines. These race-related differences in immunoreactivity to ENO1 could not be accounted by differential autoantibody recognition of phosphoepitopes within this antigen. Proteomic analysis revealed differences in the posttranslational modification profiles of ENO1 variants differentially recognized by AA-PCa and EA-PCa sera. These intriguing results suggest the possibility of race-related differences in the antitumor autoantibody response in PCa, and have implications for defining novel biological determinants of PCa health disparities.

Citing Articles

Immunoseroproteomic profiling in autoantibody to ENO1 as potential biomarker in immunodiagnosis of osteosarcoma by serological proteome analysis (SERPA) approach.

Li J, Dai L, Huang M, Ma Y, Guo Z, Wang X Oncoimmunology. 2024; 10(1):1966969.

PMID: 38260036 PMC: 10802918. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1966969.


A Luminex Approach to Develop an Anti-Tumor-Associated Antigen Autoantibody Panel for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Racially/Ethnically Diverse Populations.

Qiu C, Wang X, Batson S, Wang B, Casiano C, Francia G Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37627091 PMC: 10452333. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164064.


Prostate cancer autoantibodies - applications in diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring disease progression and immunotherapy.

Jayakrishnan R, Schafer C, Tan S Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2023; 11(2):79-102.

PMID: 37168942 PMC: 10165224.


Serum Androgen Metabolites Correlate with Clinical Variables in African and European American Men with Localized, Therapy Naïve Prostate Cancer.

Ramakrishnan S, Kittles R, Huss W, Wang J, Attwood K, Woloszynska A Metabolites. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36837903 PMC: 9962438. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13020284.


Immune mechanisms behind prostate cancer in men of African ancestry: A review.

Sentana-Lledo D, Sartor O, Balk S, Einstein D Prostate. 2022; 82(8):883-893.

PMID: 35254710 PMC: 9875381. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24333.


References
1.
Theodore S, Sharp S, Zhou J, Turner T, Li H, Miki J . Establishment and characterization of a pair of non-malignant and malignant tumor derived cell lines from an African American prostate cancer patient. Int J Oncol. 2010; 37(6):1477-82. PMC: 3132581. DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000800. View

2.
Wells T, Bukowinski A, Smith T, Smith B, Dennis L, Chu L . Racial differences in prostate cancer risk remain among US servicemen with equal access to care. Prostate. 2009; 70(7):727-34. DOI: 10.1002/pros.21105. View

3.
Vizcaino J, Csordas A, Del-Toro N, Dianes J, Griss J, Lavidas I . 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 44(D1):D447-56. PMC: 4702828. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1145. View

4.
Capello M, Ferri-Borgogno S, Cappello P, Novelli F . α-Enolase: a promising therapeutic and diagnostic tumor target. FEBS J. 2011; 278(7):1064-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08025.x. View

5.
Jung D, Kim W, Park S, Lee J, Kim J, Su D . A unique small molecule inhibitor of enolase clarifies its role in fundamental biological processes. ACS Chem Biol. 2013; 8(6):1271-82. DOI: 10.1021/cb300687k. View