Automated Literature Searches for Longitudinal Tracking of Cancer Research Training Program Graduates

Overview

Journal J Cancer Educ

Publisher Springer

Specialties Medical Education
Oncology

Date 2016 Oct 14

PMID 27734282

Citations 4

Authors

Luz A Padilla

Renee A Desmond

C Michael Brooks

John W Waterbor

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A key outcome measure of cancer research training programs is the number of cancer-related peer-reviewed publications after training. Because program graduates do not routinely report their publications, staff must periodically conduct electronic literature searches on each graduate. The purpose of this study is to compare findings of an innovative computer-based automated search program versus repeated manual literature searches to identify post-training peer-reviewed publications. In late 2014, manual searches for publications by former R25 students identified 232 cancer-related articles published by 112 of 543 program graduates. In 2016, a research assistant was instructed in performing Scopus literature searches for comparison with individual PubMed searches on our 543 program graduates. Through 2014, Scopus found 304 cancer publications, 220 of that had been retrieved manually plus an additional 84 papers. However, Scopus missed 12 publications found manually. Together, both methods found 316 publications. The automated method found 96.2 % of the 316 publications while individual searches found only 73.4 %. An automated search method such as using the Scopus database is a key tool for conducting comprehensive literature searches, but it must be supplemented with periodic manual searches to find the initial publications of program graduates. A time-saving feature of Scopus is the periodic automatic alerts of new publications. Although a training period is needed and initial costs can be high, an automated search method is worthwhile due to its high sensitivity and efficiency in the long term.

Citing Articles

Publications search optimization: Comparison of a homegrown-API approach versus manual publication searches at an NCI designated cancer center.

Cernik C, Fife J, Thompson J, Harlan-Williams L, Mudaranthakam D Health Informatics J. 2020; 26(4):3066-3071.

PMID: 33148085 PMC: 8024109. DOI: 10.1177/1460458220966816.

A Translational Approach to Cancer Research, Education and Training.

Ezelle H, Geiman T, Schnaper L, Cullen K, Lapidus R, Hassel B J Cancer Educ. 2020; 36(3):621-629.

PMID: 31907826 PMC: 7384627. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01675-3.

Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Patel S, Walsh C, Udell J BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1):140.

PMID: 31088445 PMC: 6515625. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z.

Twenty-five-Year Follow-up of Short-term Cancer Research Trainees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: a Brief Report.

Desmond R, Venkatesh R, Padilla L, Daniel C, Litton A, Heimburger D J Cancer Educ. 2018; 34(5):1010-1013.

PMID: 30043388 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1404-y.

References

Kumar H, Jayaram S, Kumar G, Vinita J, Rohit S, Satish M . Perception, Practices Towards Research and Predictors of Research Career Among UG Medical Students from Coastal South India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Indian J Community Med. 2010; 34(4):306-9. PMC: 2822190. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.58388. View

Libby A, Hosokawa P, Fairclough D, Prochazka A, Jones P, Ginde A . Grant Success for Early-Career Faculty in Patient-Oriented Research: Difference-in-Differences Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Mentored Research Training Program. Acad Med. 2016; 91(12):1666-1675. PMC: 5177544. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001263. View

Heimburger D, Waterbor J, Fish L, Brooks C . An interdisciplinary training program in nutrition sciences and cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2000; 15(3):130-3. DOI: 10.1080/08858190009528678. View

Devi V, Abraham R, Adiga A, Ramnarayan K, Kamath A . Fostering research skills in undergraduate medical students through mentored students projects: example from an Indian medical school. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2012; 8(31):294-8. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i3.6215. View

Daniel C, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor J . Approaches for longitudinally tracking graduates of NCI-funded short-term cancer research training programs. J Cancer Educ. 2011; 26(1):58-63. PMC: 3930441. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0190-y. View

Desmond R, Padilla L, Daniel C, Prickett C, Venkatesh R, Michael Brooks C . Career Outcomes of Graduates of R25E Short-Term Cancer Research Training Programs. J Cancer Educ. 2015; 31(1):93-100. PMC: 4511721. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0786-8. View

Sheikh A, Sheikh S, Kaleem A, Waqas A . Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013; 4:237-43. PMC: 3826903. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S51536. View

Zier K, Wyatt C, Muller D . An innovative portfolio of research training programs for medical students. Immunol Res. 2012; 54(1-3):286-91. PMC: 3584715. DOI: 10.1007/s12026-012-8310-x. View

Naqvi H . Students' research: tradition ahead of its time. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010; 20(10):701-2. DOI: 10.2010/JCPSP.701702. View

10.

Jimmy R, Palatty P, DSilva P, Baliga M, Singh A . Are medical students inclined to do research?". J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 7(12):2892-5. PMC: 3919354. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6698.3786. View

11.

. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach. 2002; 24(2):130-5. DOI: 10.1080/01421590220120731. View

12.

Padilla L, Venkatesh R, Daniel C, Desmond R, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor J . An Evaluation Methodology for Longitudinal Studies of Short-Term Cancer Research Training Programs. J Cancer Educ. 2014; 31(1):84-92. PMC: 4441613. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0758-z. View

13.

Hunskaar S, Breivik J, Siebke M, Tommeras K, Figenschau K, Hansen J . Evaluation of the medical student research programme in Norwegian medical schools. A survey of students and supervisors. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9:43. PMC: 2720957. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-43. View

14.

Nikkar-Esfahani A, Jamjoom A, Fitzgerald J . Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Med Teach. 2012; 34(5):e317-24. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.670324. View

15.

Waterbor J, Heimburger D, Fish L, Etten T, Michael Brooks C . An interdisciplinary cancer prevention and control training program in public health. J Cancer Educ. 2002; 17(2):85-91. DOI: 10.1080/08858190209528805. View

16.

Heimburger D, Waterbor J, Fish L, Brooks C . Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. J Cancer Educ. 2000; 15(2):69-72. DOI: 10.1080/08858190009528659. View

17.

Burgoyne L, OFlynn S, Boylan G . Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010; 15. PMC: 2939395. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212. View