» Articles » PMID: 27734221

Educational and Psychosocial Support Needs in Lynch Syndrome: Implementation and Assessment of an Educational Workshop and Support Group

Abstract

Few reports of educational and counseling support resources exist for Lynch syndrome (LS), a disorder requiring multi-organ cancer screening and specialized medical care throughout adult life. Here we describe the development and efficacy of two resources designed to address this need, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Clinical Genetics Service annual Lynch Syndrome Educational Workshop (LSEW), and a quarterly Lynch Syndrome Patient Advocacy Network (LSPAN) support group. The LSEW and LSPAN were implemented beginning in 2012. Participant survey data evaluating satisfaction, clarity, and unmet needs for each event were retrospectively analyzed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Annual LSEW attendance ranged from 53 to 75 total participants. LSEW year 1 participants indicated a need for a support group, and preferred in-person meetings at a frequency of every 3-6 months. For LSEW year 2-5 participants, >96 % reported satisfaction with the LSEW, and >82 % expressed interest in secure online support. Common themes for improvement included increased time for question and answer sessions and additional introductory genetics education. Responding LSPAN participants (n = 57 total survey responses in 11 meetings) found the meetings helpful (100 %), information clear (91 %), and presence of a genetic counselor useful (67 %). Desired discussion topics included coping with stress and anxiety, development of a support network, family communication about LS, genetic testing decisions, and bereavement. Following genetic counseling, a need exists for ongoing educational and emotional support in LS. Implementation of resources such as the LSEW and LSPAN is feasible and perceived as helpful by participants.

Citing Articles

Experiences of patients and family members with follow-up care, information needs and provider support after identification of Lynch Syndrome.

Mooney R, Wu Y, Kehoe K, Volkmar M, Kohlmann W, Koptiuch C Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2023; 21(1):28.

PMID: 38115072 PMC: 10731879. DOI: 10.1186/s13053-023-00273-1.


The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.

Zimmermann B, Shaw D, Elger B, Kone I PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0260597.

PMID: 34847204 PMC: 8631642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260597.


Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale (GCSS) as an Outcome Measure of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Villafane-Bernier C, Lapointe J, Raiche C, Lauzier S, Chiquette J, Bouchard K Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(9).

PMID: 34574919 PMC: 8465088. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9091145.


Communication research at the National Cancer Institute, 2013-2019: a grant portfolio analysis.

Gaysynsky A, Rising C, Trivedi N, Blake K, Chou W, Oh A Cancer Causes Control. 2021; 32(12):1333-1345.

PMID: 34313875 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01481-7.


Endoscopy to Diagnose and Prevent Digestive Cancers in Lynch Syndrome.

Olivier R, Randrian V, Tougeron D, Saurin J Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(14).

PMID: 34298719 PMC: 8305049. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143505.


References
1.
Hughes L, Phelps C . "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. J Genet Couns. 2010; 19(5):487-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9300-6. View

2.
Berger J . Crisis intervention: a drop-in support group for cancer patients and their families. Soc Work Health Care. 1984; 10(2):81-92. DOI: 10.1300/j010v10n02_07. View

3.
Akiyama Y, Sato H, Yamada T, Nagasaki H, Tsuchiya A, Abe R . Germ-line mutation of the hMSH6/GTBP gene in an atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer kindred. Cancer Res. 1997; 57(18):3920-3. View

4.
Speice J, McDaniel S, Rowley P, Loader S . Family issues in a psychoeducation group for women with a BRCA mutation. Clin Genet. 2002; 62(2):121-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2002.620204.x. View

5.
DeMarco T, Peshkin B, Mars B, Tercyak K . Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale. J Genet Couns. 2009; 13(4):293-304. PMC: 3551590. DOI: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000035523.96133.bc. View