» Articles » PMID: 27730016

A System for Simple Real-Time Anastomotic Failure Detection and Wireless Blood Flow Monitoring in the Lower Limbs

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 13
PMID 27730016
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current totally implantable wireless blood flow monitors are large and cannot operate alongside nearby monitors. To alleviate the problems with the current monitors, we developed a system to monitor blood flow wirelessly, with a simple and easily interpretable real-time output. To the best of our knowledge, the implanted electronics are the smallest in reported literature, which reduces bio-burden. Calibration was performed across realistic physiological flow ranges using a syringe pump. The device's sensors connected directly to the bilateral femoral veins of swine. For each 1 min, blood flow was monitored, then, an occlusion was introduced, and then, the occlusion was removed to resume flow. Each vein of four pigs was monitored four times, totaling 32 data collections. The implant measured 1.70 cm without battery/encapsulation. Across its calibrated range, including equipment tolerances, the relative error is less than ±5% above 8 mL/min and between -0.8% and +1.2% at its largest calibrated flow rate, which to the best of our knowledge is the lowest reported in the literature across the measured calibration range. The average standard deviation of the flow waveform amplitude was three times greater than that of no-flow. Establishing the relative amplitude for the flow and no-flow waveforms was found necessary, particularly for noise modulated Doppler signals. Its size and accuracy, compared with other microcontroller-equipped totally implantable monitors, make it a good candidate for future tether-free free flap monitoring studies.

Citing Articles

A paintable phosphorescent bandage for postoperative tissue oxygen assessment in DIEP flap reconstruction.

Marks H, Bucknor A, Roussakis E, Nowell N, Kamali P, Cascales J Sci Adv. 2020; 6(51).

PMID: 33355131 PMC: 11206211. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1061.


A smartphone-enabled wireless and batteryless implantable blood flow sensor for remote monitoring of prosthetic heart valve function.

Vennemann B, Obrist D, Rosgen T PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227372.

PMID: 31935231 PMC: 6959614. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227372.


The Future of Cardiovascular Stents: Bioresorbable and Integrated Biosensor Technology.

Hoare D, Bussooa A, Neale S, Mirzai N, Mercer J Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019; 6(20):1900856.

PMID: 31637160 PMC: 6794628. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201900856.

References
1.
Smit J, Whitaker I, Liss A, Audolfsson T, Kildal M, Acosta R . Post operative monitoring of microvascular breast reconstructions using the implantable Cook-Swartz doppler system: a study of 145 probes & technical discussion. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 62(10):1286-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.007. View

2.
Ferguson Jr R, Yu P . Techniques of monitoring buried fasciocutaneous free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123(2):525-532. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318196b9a3. View

3.
Momoh A, Yu P, Skoracki R, Liu S, Feng L, Hanasono M . A prospective cohort study of fibula free flap donor-site morbidity in 157 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(3):714-720. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221dc2a. View

4.
Fernando B, Young V, Logan S . Miniature implantable laser Doppler probe monitoring of free tissue transfer. Ann Plast Surg. 1988; 20(5):434-42. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198805000-00006. View

5.
Nelson T, Pretorius D . The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 151(3):439-47. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.3.439. View