» Articles » PMID: 27725802

Preclinical Imaging for Fat Tissue Identification, Quantification, and Functional Characterization

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2016 Oct 12
PMID 27725802
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Localization, differentiation, and quantitative assessment of fat tissues have always collected the interest of researchers. Nowadays, these topics are even more relevant as obesity (the excess of fat tissue) is considered a real pathology requiring in some cases pharmacological and surgical approaches. Several weight loss medications, acting either on the metabolism or on the central nervous system, are currently under preclinical or clinical investigation. Animal models of obesity have been developed and are widely used in pharmaceutical research. The assessment of candidate drugs in animal models requires non-invasive methods for longitudinal assessment of efficacy, the main outcome being the amount of body fat. Fat tissues can be either quantified in the entire animal or localized and measured in selected organs/regions of the body. Fat tissues are characterized by peculiar contrast in several imaging modalities as for example Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) that can distinguish between fat and water protons thank to their different magnetic resonance properties. Since fat tissues have higher carbon/hydrogen content than other soft tissues and bones, they can be easily assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) as well. Interestingly, MRI also discriminates between white and brown adipose tissue (BAT); the latter has long been regarded as a potential target for anti-obesity drugs because of its ability to enhance energy consumption through increased thermogenesis. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) performed with F-FDG as glucose analog radiotracer reflects well the metabolic rate in body tissues and consequently is the technique of choice for studies of BAT metabolism. This review will focus on the main, non-invasive imaging techniques (MRI, CT, and PET) that are fundamental for the assessment, quantification and functional characterization of fat deposits in small laboratory animals. The contribution of optical techniques, which are currently regarded with increasing interest, will be also briefly described. For each technique the physical principles of signal detection will be overviewed and some relevant studies will be summarized. Far from being exhaustive, this review has the purpose to highlight some strategies that can be adopted for the identification, quantification, and functional characterization of adipose tissues mainly from the point of view of biophysics and physiology.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive optoacoustic imaging of dermal microcirculatory revascularization in diet-induced obese mice undergoing exercise intervention.

Huang S, He H, Tom R, Glasl S, Anzenhofer P, Stiel A Photoacoustics. 2024; 38:100628.

PMID: 39055739 PMC: 11269314. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2024.100628.


Are MTV and TLG Accurate for Quantifying the Intensity of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation?.

Jalloul W, Moscalu M, Moscalu R, Jalloul D, Grierosu I, Gutu M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38255256 PMC: 10813038. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010151.


Emerging technologies in adipose tissue research.

Avtanski D, Hadzi-Petrushev N, Josifovska S, Mladenov M, Reddy V Adipocyte. 2023; 12(1):2248673.

PMID: 37599422 PMC: 10443968. DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2023.2248673.


Association between Body Composition Contents and Hepatic Fibrosis in Sarcopenic Obesity.

Kim T, Jeong C, Lee C, Noh S, Lim D, Kim J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445314 PMC: 10342967. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134279.


Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Towards Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Turano E, Scambi I, Virla F, Bonetti B, Mariotti R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(3).

PMID: 36769247 PMC: 9917806. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032917.


References
1.
Osculati F, Sbarbati A, Leclercq F, Zancanaro C, Accordini C, Antonakis K . The correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrastructural patterns of brown adipose tissue. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1991; 23(1):167-74. View

2.
Ye Q, Danzer C, Fuchs A, Wolfrum C, Rudin M . Hepatic lipid composition differs between ob/ob and ob/+ control mice as determined by using in vivo localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. MAGMA. 2012; 25(5):381-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0310-2. View

3.
Bjorntorp P . [Metabolic difference between visceral fat and subcutaneous abdominal fat]. Diabetes Metab. 2000; 26 Suppl 3:10-2. View

4.
Mosconi E, Sima D, Osorio Garcia M, Fontanella M, Fiorini S, Van Huffel S . Different quantification algorithms may lead to different results: a comparison using proton MRS lipid signals. NMR Biomed. 2014; 27(4):431-43. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3079. View

5.
Marin P, Andersson B, Ottosson M, OLBE L, Chowdhury B, Kvist H . The morphology and metabolism of intraabdominal adipose tissue in men. Metabolism. 1992; 41(11):1242-8. DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90016-4. View