» Articles » PMID: 27722824

Intramedullary and Extramedullary Fixations for the Treatment of Unstable Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures: a Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Oct 11
PMID 27722824
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intramedullary and extramedullary fixation methods are widely used to treat unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures, but the optimal surgical method remains controversial. The aim of this study was to estimate the outcomes of intramedullary fixation versus extramedullary fixation in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods: Electronic literature databases were used for searching including MEDLINE (Ovid interface), EMBASE (Ovid interface) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Wiley Online Library) (up to March 30, 2016). Only human studies, which were designed as randomized controlled clinical trials, were included. Two authors independently evaluated the quality of original literature and extracted data from eligible literature.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 1,543 patients were included. Intramedullary fixation was significantly better in functional scores (SMD 0.43, 95 % CI 0.14-0.73, P = 0.004) and had less blood loss (SMD -0.96, 95 % CI -1.77 to -0.11, P = 0.03) in contrast with extramedullary fixation. No obvious discrepancies were found in adverse events, operative time, blood transfusion, and hospital stay between intramedullary and extramedullary fixations.

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis of 11 prospective randomized controlled trials suggested: no obvious discrepancies were found in adverse events, operative time, blood transfusion, and hospital stay between intramedullary and extramedullary fixations. Given the better results of intramedullary fixation in terms of functional scores and blood loss, we recommend the intramedullary fixation technique in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Large multi-center RCTs, which focused on unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures, are needed to evaluate the efficiency of alternative internal fixation strategies in the future.

Citing Articles

A retrospective comparative study of the clinical and radiological outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) and INTERTAN nail.

Varmis H, Gokmen M, Tan I PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316954.

PMID: 39761283 PMC: 11703086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316954.


The PFNA in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with or without lateral wall fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Tang Y, Wang D, Wang L, Xiong W, Fang Q, Lin W Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):380.

PMID: 37759288 PMC: 10523796. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01332-y.


Dual-screw versus single-screw cephalomedullary nails for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang F, Li X, Zhao L, Yang Q J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):607.

PMID: 37599361 PMC: 10440877. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04103-x.


Study protocol: biomechanical testing, finite element analysis and prospective, randomized, clinical study of single screw cephalomedullary nailing versus integrated dual interlocking screw fixation for unstable (31A2) intertrochanteric fractures in....

Panagopoulos A, Argyropoulou E, Kokkalis Z, Parchas N, Tserpes K J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):542.

PMID: 37507795 PMC: 10386776. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04009-8.


Intramedullary Nailing vs Sliding Hip Screw in Trochanteric Fracture Management: The INSITE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Schemitsch E, Nowak L, Schulz A, Brink O, Poolman R, Mehta S JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2317164.

PMID: 37278998 PMC: 10245197. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17164.


References
1.
Yuan G, Shen Y, Chen B, Zhang W . Biomechanical comparison of internal fixations in osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. A finite element analysis. Saudi Med J. 2012; 33(7):732-9. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10):1006-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. View

3.
Papasimos S, Koutsojannis C, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E . A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005; 125(7):462-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-005-0021-5. View

4.
Marsh J, Slongo T, Agel J, Broderick J, Creevey W, DeCoster T . Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001. View

5.
Reindl R, Harvey E, Berry G, Rahme E . Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(23):1905-12. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01007. View