» Articles » PMID: 27718637

New Levothyroxine Formulation Meeting 95-105% Specification over the Whole Shelf-life: Results from Two Pharmacokinetic Trials

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2016 Oct 11
PMID 27718637
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Small levothyroxine (L-T4) dose changes can lead to significant clinical effects. To ensure thyroid hormone levels are safely maintained, authorities are increasingly adopting stricter potency specifications for L-T4, the most stringent of these being 95-105% of the labeled dose over the whole shelf-life. Levothyroxine sodium (Euthyrox, Eutirox, Lévothyrox ) has been reformulated, and two studies performed, to ensure bioequivalence to the currently marketed formulation and dosage form proportionality of the new formulation.

Methods: The bioequivalence study was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover comparing the highest dosage strengths of the currently marketed and the new L-T4 formulation at a total dose of 600 μg. The dosage form proportionality study was an open-label, randomized, three-period, six-sequence crossover, comparing 50 μg, 100 μg, and 200 μg L-T4 tablets, at a total dose of 600 μg. Blood samples were taken at predefined time intervals. Primary outcomes were area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C) of thyroxine (T4) in plasma.

Results: In the bioequivalence study, comparing the T4 profiles for the new and current formulation of L-T4, the geometric least square mean ratio of the baseline-adjusted AUC was 99.3% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 95.6-103.2) and the C was 101.7% (90% CI: 98.8-104.6). Bioequivalence was established if the 90% CI lay within the predefined 0.9-1.11 limits. In the dosage form proportionality study, pairwise comparisons ranged from 99.3% to 104.8%, and all 95% CIs were within the predefined CI range (0.8-1.25): the three dose strengths were dosage form proportional.

Conclusions: The new formulation of L-T4 meets the most stringent potency specification guidelines, and has been demonstrated to be bioequivalent to the current formulation and to show dosage form proportionality. The new formulation will enable patients to receive a dose fine tuned to their medical needs, contributing to improved safety in the use of L-T4.

Citing Articles

Advancing drug safety and mitigating health concerns: High-resolution mass spectrometry in the levothyroxine case study.

Chmelarova H, Catapano M, Garrigues J, Svec F, Novakova L J Pharm Anal. 2024; 14(9):100970.

PMID: 39350965 PMC: 11440252. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2024.100970.


Exploring Microemulsion Systems for the Incorporation of Glucocorticoids into Bacterial Cellulose: A Novel Approach for Anti-Inflammatory Wound Dressings.

Zahel P, Bruggink V, Hulsmann J, Steiniger F, Hofstetter R, Heinzel T Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38675165 PMC: 11054342. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040504.


Within-subject pharmacokinetic variability has a strong influence on individual exposure ratios in bioequivalence studies, hence on drug formulation interchangeability.

Lechat P, Kir F, Marquet P, Woillard J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 79(11):1565-1578.

PMID: 37737912 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03565-6.


Comment on "Interchangeability between Generic and Reference Products: Limits of Average Bioequivalence Methodology".

Nicolas P, Bertagna X Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2023; 48(2):213-215.

PMID: 36670339 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00814-4.


Response to Comment on "Interchangeability Between Generic and Reference Products: Limits of Average Bioequivalence Methodology".

Lechat P Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2023; 48(2):217-219.

PMID: 36670338 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00813-5.