» Articles » PMID: 27718121

What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Oct 9
PMID 27718121
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In recent years, surgical treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been increasingly performed using arthroscopy. Bony pathomorphologies and damage to the labrum as well as cartilage defects can be addressed with comparable results to open surgery with overall less surgery-related complications. Despite the increasing importance of hip arthroscopy, however, reports on midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes and comparison to open surgical hip dislocation are scarce.

Questions/purposes: (1) What are the clinical and radiographic outcomes at a mean 7-year followup; (2) what is the cumulative 7-year survivorship, using the endpoints of THA, progression of osteoarthritis according to Tönnis, or poor clinical outcome with a Merle d'Aubigné score of less than 15 points, of hips with symptomatic FAI treated arthroscopically; and (3) what factors were associated with revision surgery?

Methods: Between 2003 and 2008 we performed a total of 62 arthroscopic procedures (60 patients) for FAI. For the same indication, we also performed 571 surgical hip dislocations during that time. Standardized treatment was femoral offset correction, acetabular rim trimming, or both and treatment of labral or chondral defects. An arthroscopic approach was generally used if the pathomorphology was located in the anterosuperior quadrant of the hip and was gradually used for more complex cases. We excluded 10 hips (10 patients) in which the standardized treatment was not achieved and no offset correction or acetabular rim trimming was performed. Of the remaining 52 hips (50 patients), 39 hips underwent isolated femoral offset correction, four hips isolated acetabular rim trimming, and nine hips both procedures. At a mean followup of 7 years (range, 5-11 years), the Merle d'Aubigné clinical score was obtained and plain radiographs were examined (Tönnis grade, heterotopic ossification, lateral center-edge [LCE] angle, acetabular index [AI], extrusion index, alpha angle, and pistol grip deformity). Cumulative survivorship was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier using conversion to THA, progression of osteoarthritis (one or more Tönnis grades), or poor clinical outcome (Merle d'Aubigné score < 15 points) as endpoints. Cox regression analysis was used to identify univariate factors associated with revision surgery.

Results: At last followup we detected a significant but possibly not clinically relevant increase in Merle d'Aubigné scores from preoperative levels to latest followup (14 ± 1 versus 16 ± 2, mean difference 2 points with a 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -3 to 7, p < 0.001). Six hips showed progression of osteoarthritis. Cumulative survivorship (hips free from conversion to THA, progression of osteoarthritis, or poor clinical outcome) of hips treated with hip arthroscopy for FAI at a mean followup of 7 years was 81% (95% CI, 68%-95%). Two patients (two hips, 4%) underwent THA at 7 and 9 years, respectively. An increased preoperative acetabular coverage (LCE angle, AI), increased offset in the superior portion of the femoral neck (pistol grip deformity), and a remaining pistol grip deformity postoperatively were associated with revision surgery. Any treatment of the labrum did not influence the outcome. Factors associated with failure could not be identified.

Conclusions: In this series of patients with arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic FAI, hip arthroscopy resulted in an intact hip without progression of osteoarthritis and with a Merle d'Aubigné score of ≥ 15 points in 81% of patients at 7-year followup. Increased acetabular coverage and femoral pistol grip deformity were risk factors for revision surgery.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Citing Articles

The Definition of Failure in Hip Arthroscopy May Include Factors Outside of Reoperation: A Systematic Review.

Bernard C, Bowles E, Trotter M, Aldag L, Henkelman E, Long R Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(5):100962.

PMID: 39534025 PMC: 11551386. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100962.


Outcomes of Painful Hips After Hip Arthroscopy Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Verma G, Goru P, Heaton R, Ahmed T, Ismail M, Shah S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68190.

PMID: 39347265 PMC: 11439185. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68190.


Hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment for femoroacetabular impingement: midterm results from a large-scale patient cohort.

Wagner M, Lindtner R, Schaller L, Schmaranzer F, Schmaranzer E, Vavron P J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):29.

PMID: 38789896 PMC: 11126547. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00770-6.


Assessment of Risk Factors and Rate of Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy Utilizing a Large Database of Commercially Insured Patients in the United States.

Tiao J, Ranson W, Ren R, Wang K, Rosenberg A, Herrera M Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(2):23259671231217494.

PMID: 38352174 PMC: 10863482. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231217494.


Injections prior to hip arthroscopy are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years.

Johnson A, Brennan J, Maley A, Levermore S, Turcotte J, Petre B Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(2):823-829.

PMID: 38103052 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05164-7.


References
1.
MERLE dAUBIGNE R, Postel M . The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. 1954. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(1):7-27. PMC: 2600978. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0572-1. View

2.
Matsuda D, Philippon M, Safran M, Sampson T . Hip Arthroscopy: Tales From the Crypt. Instr Course Lect. 2016; 65:437-45. View

3.
Larson C, Giveans M, Stone R . Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(5):1015-21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434578. View

4.
Tannast M, Hanke M, Zheng G, Steppacher S, Siebenrock K . What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 473(4):1234-46. PMC: 4353515. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3. View

5.
Sandoval E, Martin-Rios M, Cimas D, Masegosa A, Calvo E . Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative study between the classic and the outside-in access. Hip Int. 2016; 26(3):290-4. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000336. View