» Articles » PMID: 27717082

Stratification of Unresponsive Patients by an Independently Validated Index of Brain Complexity

Abstract

Objective: Validating objective, brain-based indices of consciousness in behaviorally unresponsive patients represents a challenge due to the impossibility of obtaining independent evidence through subjective reports. Here we address this problem by first validating a promising metric of consciousness-the Perturbational Complexity Index (PCI)-in a benchmark population who could confirm the presence or absence of consciousness through subjective reports, and then applying the same index to patients with disorders of consciousness (DOCs).

Methods: The benchmark population encompassed 150 healthy controls and communicative brain-injured subjects in various states of conscious wakefulness, disconnected consciousness, and unconsciousness. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to define an optimal cutoff for discriminating between the conscious and unconscious conditions. This cutoff was then applied to a cohort of noncommunicative DOC patients (38 in a minimally conscious state [MCS] and 43 in a vegetative state [VS]).

Results: We found an empirical cutoff that discriminated with 100% sensitivity and specificity between the conscious and the unconscious conditions in the benchmark population. This cutoff resulted in a sensitivity of 94.7% in detecting MCS and allowed the identification of a number of unresponsive VS patients (9 of 43) with high values of PCI, overlapping with the distribution of the benchmark conscious condition.

Interpretation: Given its high sensitivity and specificity in the benchmark and MCS population, PCI offers a reliable, independently validated stratification of unresponsive patients that has important physiopathological and therapeutic implications. In particular, the high-PCI subgroup of VS patients may retain a capacity for consciousness that is not expressed in behavior. Ann Neurol 2016;80:718-729.

Citing Articles

Consciousness or pseudo-consciousness? A clash of two paradigms.

Tononi G, Albantakis L, Barbosa L, Boly M, Cirelli C, Comolatti R Nat Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40065188 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01880-y.


Reconstructing Covert Consciousness: Neural Decoding as a Novel Consciousness Assessment.

Fischer D, Edlow B, Freeman H, Alaiev D, Wu Q, Ware J Neurology. 2025; 104(4):e210208.

PMID: 39883908 PMC: 11781786. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210208.


Complex auditory regularity processing across levels of consciousness in coma: Stage 1 Registered Report.

Pelentritou A, Cataldi J, Zubler F, Iten M, Haenggi M, Ben-Hamouda N Brain Commun. 2025; 7(1):fcae466.

PMID: 39822953 PMC: 11735756. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae466.


Revolutionizing treatment for disorders of consciousness: a multidisciplinary review of advancements in deep brain stimulation.

Yang Y, Cao T, He S, Wang L, He Q, Fan L Mil Med Res. 2024; 11(1):81.

PMID: 39690407 PMC: 11654023. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00585-w.


Consciousness and Energy Processing in Neural Systems.

Pepperell R Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595875 PMC: 11591782. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111112.


References
1.
Casali A, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali K . A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(198):198ra105. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294. View

2.
Laureys S, Schiff N . Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(2):478-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.041. View

3.
McCormick D, Prince D . Mechanisms of action of acetylcholine in the guinea-pig cerebral cortex in vitro. J Physiol. 1986; 375:169-94. PMC: 1182754. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016112. View

4.
Mutanen T, Maki H, Ilmoniemi R . The effect of stimulus parameters on TMS-EEG muscle artifacts. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):371-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.07.005. View

5.
Lutkenhoff E, Chiang J, Tshibanda L, Kamau E, Kirsch M, Pickard J . Thalamic and extrathalamic mechanisms of consciousness after severe brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2015; 78(1):68-76. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24423. View