» Articles » PMID: 27716351

Does the Optimal Position of the Acetabular Fragment Should Be Within the Radiological Normal Range for All Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip? A Patient-specific Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Oct 8
PMID 27716351
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The success of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy depends significantly on how extent the acetabular fragment can be corrected to its optimal position. This study was undertaken to investigate whether correcting the acetabular fragment into the so-called radiological "normal" range is the best choice for all developmental dysplasia of the hip with different severities of dysplasia from the biomechanical view? If not, is there any correlation between the biomechanically optimal position of the acetabular fragment and the severity of dysplasia?

Methods: Four finite element models with different severities of dysplasia were developed. The virtual periacetabular osteotomy was performed with the acetabular fragment rotated anterolaterally to incremental center-edge angles; then, the contact area and pressure and von Mises stress in the cartilage were calculated at different correction angles.

Results: The optimal position of the acetabular fragment for patients 1, 2, and 3 was when the acetabular fragment rotated 17° laterally (with the lateral center-edge angle of 36° and anterior center-edge angle of 58°; both were slightly larger than the "normal" range), 25° laterally following further 5° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 31° and anterior center-edge angle of 51°; both were within the "normal" range), and 30° laterally following further 10° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 25° and anterior center-edge angle of 40°; both were less than the "normal" range), respectively.

Conclusions: The optimal corrective position of the acetabular fragment is severity dependent rather than within the radiological "normal" range for developmental dysplasia of the hip. We prudently proposed that the optimal correction center-edge angle of mild, moderate, and severe developmental dysplasia of the hip is slightly larger than the "normal" range, within the "normal" range, and less than the lower limit of the "normal" range, respectively.

Citing Articles

Integrating finite element analysis in total hip arthroplasty for childhood hip disorders: Enhancing precision and outcomes.

Ammarullah M World J Orthop. 2025; 16(1):98871.

PMID: 39850035 PMC: 11752482. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i1.98871.


Three-dimensional acetabular reorientation during periacetabular osteotomy: an intraoperative navigation method using an external fixator for periacetabular osteotomy.

Schwarz T, Maderbacher G, Leiss F, Grifka J, Kappenschneider T, Knebl M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4969-4977.

PMID: 39313642 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05590-1.


Evaluation of the short-term curative effect of closed reduction in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip based on three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging finite element analysis.

Liu J, Gao T, Li J, Shan H, Pan S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):455.

PMID: 35568888 PMC: 9107141. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05401-x.


Biomechanical effect of metal augment and bone graft on cup stability for acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty in hip dysplasia: a finite element analysis.

Wang Y, Wang M, Li C, Nakamura Y, Deng L, Yamako G BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):277.

PMID: 35321681 PMC: 8943934. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05168-1.


Three-dimensional acetabular orientation during periacetabular osteotomy: a video analysis of acetabular rim position using an external fixator as navigation tool during reorientation procedure.

Schwarz T, Maderbacher G, Leiss F, Grifka J, Heers G, Matussek J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 142(3):381-386.

PMID: 33098458 PMC: 8843857. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03632-y.


References
1.
Ghosh R, Pal B, Ghosh D, Gupta S . Finite element analysis of a hemi-pelvis: the effect of inclusion of cartilage layer on acetabular stresses and strain. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013; 18(7):697-710. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.843674. View

2.
Won Y, Chung I, Chung N, Song K . Morphological study on the acetabular labrum. Yonsei Med J. 2003; 44(5):855-62. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.5.855. View

3.
Viceconti M, Olsen S, Nolte L, Burton K . Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005; 20(5):451-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.010. View

4.
Bay B, Hamel A, Olson S, Sharkey N . Statically equivalent load and support conditions produce different hip joint contact pressures and periacetabular strains. J Biomech. 1997; 30(2):193-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00120-0. View

5.
Henak C, Ellis B, Harris M, Anderson A, Peters C, Weiss J . Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint. J Biomech. 2011; 44(12):2201-6. PMC: 3225073. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.011. View