» Articles » PMID: 27716243

Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN): Evolution of a Content Management System for Point-of-care Clinical Decision Support

Abstract

Background: The Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN) is an international collaborative project with the overall objective of standardizing the approach to the evaluation and treatment of critically ill patients world-wide, in accordance with best-practice principles. One of CERTAIN's key features is clinical decision support providing point-of-care information about common acute illness syndromes, procedures, and medications in an index card format.

Methods: This paper describes 1) the process of developing and validating the content for point-of-care decision support, and 2) the content management system that facilitates frequent peer-review and allows rapid updates of content across different platforms (CERTAIN software, mobile apps, pdf-booklet) and different languages.

Results: Content was created based on survey results of acute care providers and validated using an open peer-review process. Over a 3 year period, CERTAIN content expanded to include 67 syndrome cards, 30 procedure cards, and 117 medication cards. 127 (59 %) cards have been peer-reviewed so far. Initially MS Word® and Dropbox® were used to create, store, and share content for peer-review. Recently Google Docs® was used to make the peer-review process more efficient. However, neither of these approaches met our security requirements nor has the capacity to instantly update the different CERTAIN platforms.

Conclusion: Although we were able to successfully develop and validate a large inventory of clinical decision support cards in a short period of time, commercially available software solutions for content management are suboptimal. Novel custom solutions are necessary for efficient global point of care content system management.

Citing Articles

A novel multimodal needs assessment to inform the longitudinal education program for an international interprofessional critical care team.

Li H, Sun Y, Barwise A, Cui W, Dong Y, Tekin A BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):540.

PMID: 35831867 PMC: 9281106. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03605-2.


Enhancing Diagnosis Through Technology: Decision Support, Artificial Intelligence, and Beyond.

El-Kareh R, Sittig D Crit Care Clin. 2021; 38(1):129-139.

PMID: 34794627 PMC: 8608279. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.08.004.


Implementation and Evaluation of a Web-Based Distribution System For Anesthesia Department Guidelines and Standard Operating Procedures: Qualitative Study and Content Analysis.

Bachmann K, Vetter C, Wenzel L, Konrad C, Vogt A J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(8):e14482.

PMID: 31418427 PMC: 6714503. DOI: 10.2196/14482.


Impact of weekly case-based tele-education on quality of care in a limited resource medical intensive care unit.

Kovacevic P, Dragic S, Kovacevic T, Momcicevic D, Festic E, Kashyap R Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):220.

PMID: 31200761 PMC: 6567671. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2494-6.


Optimizing respiratory management in resource-limited settings.

Inglis R, Ayebale E, Schultz M Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018; 25(1):45-53.

PMID: 30531535 PMC: 6319564. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000568.


References
1.
Mooney S, Baenziger P . Extensible open source content management systems and frameworks: a solution for many needs of a bioinformatics group. Brief Bioinform. 2007; 9(1):69-74. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbm057. View

2.
Haynes A, Weiser T, Berry W, Lipsitz S, Breizat A, Dellinger E . A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(5):491-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. View

3.
Densen P . Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011; 122:48-58. PMC: 3116346. View

4.
Celi L, Sarmenta L, Rotberg J, Marcelo A, Clifford G . Mobile Care (Moca) for Remote Diagnosis and Screening. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2011; 3(1):17-21. PMC: 3149792. View

5.
McNutt R, Evans A, Fletcher R, Fletcher S . The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1990; 263(10):1371-6. View