» Articles » PMID: 27714566

Acquisition Models in Intraoperative Positron Surface Imaging

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Oct 8
PMID 27714566
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intraoperative imaging aims at identifying residual tumor during surgery. Positron Surface Imaging (PSI) is one of the solutions to help surgeons in a better detection of resection margins of brain tumor, leading to an improved patient outcome. This system relies on a tracked freehand beta probe, using [Formula: see text]F-based radiotracer. Some acquisition models have been proposed in the literature in order to enhance image quality, but no comparative validation study has been performed for PSI.

Methods: In this study, we investigated the performance of different acquisition models by considering validation criteria and normalized metrics. We proposed a reference-based validation framework to perform the comparative study between acquisition models and a basic method. We estimated the performance of several acquisition models in light of four validation criteria: efficiency, computational speed, spatial accuracy and tumor contrast.

Results: Selected acquisition models outperformed the basic method, albeit with the real-time aspect compromised. One acquisition model yielded the best performance among all according to the validation criteria: efficiency (1-Spe: 0.1, Se: 0.94), spatial accuracy (max Dice: 0.77) and tumor contrast (max T/B: 5.2). We also found out that above a minimum threshold value of the sampling rate, the reconstruction quality does not vary significantly.

Conclusion: Our method allowed the comparison of different acquisition models and highlighted one of them according to our validation criteria. This novel approach can be extended to 3D datasets, for validation of future acquisition models dedicated to intraoperative guidance of brain surgery.

Citing Articles

Nuclear Cardiac Imaging in the Interventional Suite.

Pickell Z, Sinusas A Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022; 24(3):261-269.

PMID: 35028819 PMC: 8934268. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01644-1.


Advancing intraoperative magnetic tracing using 3D freehand magnetic particle imaging.

Azargoshasb S, Molenaar L, Rosiello G, Buckle T, van Willigen D, van de Loosdrecht M Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021; 17(1):211-218.

PMID: 34333740 PMC: 8738628. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02458-2.


How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation.

Wendler T, van Leeuwen F, Navab N, van Oosterom M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(13):4201-4224.

PMID: 34185136 PMC: 8566413. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05445-6.


Intraoperative biophotonic imaging systems for image-guided interventions.

Sajedi S, Sabet H, Choi H Nanophotonics. 2019; 8(1):99-116.

PMID: 31187017 PMC: 6559750. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2018-0134.


Vector field analysis for surface registration in computer-assisted ENT surgery.

Diakov G, Freysinger W Int J Med Robot. 2018; 15(2):e1977.

PMID: 30548164 PMC: 6590403. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1977.

References
1.
Gerganov V, Samii A, Giordano M, Samii M, Fahlbusch R . Two-dimensional high-end ultrasound imaging compared to intraoperative MRI during resection of low-grade gliomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18(5):669-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.08.017. View

2.
McGirt M, Chaichana K, Attenello F, Weingart J, Than K, Burger P . Extent of surgical resection is independently associated with survival in patients with hemispheric infiltrating low-grade gliomas. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63(4):700-7. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325729.41085.73. View

3.
Ius T, Isola M, Budai R, Pauletto G, Tomasino B, Fadiga L . Low-grade glioma surgery in eloquent areas: volumetric analysis of extent of resection and its impact on overall survival. A single-institution experience in 190 patients: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012; 117(6):1039-52. DOI: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS12393. View

4.
Daghighian F, Mazziotta J, Hoffman E, Shenderov P, Eshaghian B, Siegel S . Intraoperative beta probe: a device for detecting tissue labeled with positron or electron emitting isotopes during surgery. Med Phys. 1994; 21(1):153-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.597240. View

5.
Roessler K, Becherer A, Donat M, Cejna M, Zachenhofer I . Intraoperative tissue fluorescence using 5-aminolevolinic acid (5-ALA) is more sensitive than contrast MRI or amino acid positron emission tomography ((18)F-FET PET) in glioblastoma surgery. Neurol Res. 2012; 34(3):314-7. DOI: 10.1179/1743132811Y.0000000078. View