A Method for Predicting Individual Residue Contributions to Enzyme Specificity and Binding-site Energies, and Its Application to MTH1
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A new method for predicting the energy contributions to substrate binding and to specificity has been developed. Conventional global optimization methods do not permit the subtle effects responsible for these properties to be modeled with sufficient precision to allow confidence to be placed in the results, but by making simple alterations to the model, the precisions of the various energies involved can be improved from about ±2 kcal mol to ±0.1 kcal mol. This technique was applied to the oxidized nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase enzyme MTH1. MTH1 is unusual in that the binding and reaction sites are well separated-an advantage from a computational chemistry perspective, as it allows the energetics involved in docking to be modeled without the need to consider any issues relating to reaction mechanisms. In this study, two types of energy terms were investigated: the noncovalent interactions between the binding site and the substrate, and those responsible for discriminating between the oxidized nucleotide 8-oxo-dGTP and the normal dGTP. Both of these were investigated using the semiempirical method PM7 in the program MOPAC. The contributions of the individual residues to both the binding energy and the specificity of MTH1 were calculated by simulating the effect of mutations. Where comparisons were possible, all calculated results were in agreement with experimental observations. This technique provides fresh insight into the binding mechanism that enzymes use for discriminating between possible substrates.
A semiempirical method optimized for modeling proteins.
Stewart J, Stewart A J Mol Model. 2023; 29(9):284.
PMID: 37608199 PMC: 10444645. DOI: 10.1007/s00894-023-05695-1.
Oliveira L, Menezes D, Da Silva V, Lourenco E, Miranda P, Silva M Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(18).
PMID: 34576044 PMC: 8468659. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22189882.
Scantlebury J, Brown N, von Delft F, Deane C J Chem Inf Model. 2020; 60(8):3722-3730.
PMID: 32701288 PMC: 7611237. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00263.
Stewart J J Mol Model. 2017; 23(5):154.
PMID: 28378242 PMC: 5380709. DOI: 10.1007/s00894-017-3326-8.
Combined Docking with Classical Force Field and Quantum Chemical Semiempirical Method PM7.
Sulimov A, Kutov D, Katkova E, Sulimov V Adv Bioinformatics. 2017; 2017:7167691.
PMID: 28191015 PMC: 5278191. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7167691.