Development and Validation of a Photographic Method to Use for Dietary Assessment in School Settings

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2016 Oct 7

PMID 27711120

Citations 13

Authors

Anna S Olafsdottir

Agneta Hornell

Marlene Hedelin

Maria Waling

Ingibjorg Gunnarsdottir

Cecilia Olsson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a photographic method aimed at making assessment of dietary intake in school canteens non-obstrusive, practical and feasible.

Methods: The study was conducted in two elementary schools representing two different school canteen systems; main dish being served by canteen staff (Iceland), and complete self-serving (Sweden). Food items in serving and leftovers were weighed and photographed. Trained researchers estimated weights of food items by viewing the photographs and comparing them with pictures of half and full reference portions with known weights. Plates of servings and leftovers from 48 children during five school days (n = 448 plates) and a total of 5967 food items were estimated. The researchers' estimates were then compared with the true weight of the foods and the energy content calculated.

Results: Weighed and estimated amounts correlated across meals both in grams and as total energy (0.853-0.977, p<0.001). The agreement between estimated energy content in school meals was close to the true measurement from weighed records; on average 4-19 kcal below true values. Organisation of meal service impacted the efficacy of the method as seen in the difference between countries; with Iceland (served by canteen staff) having higher rate of acceptable estimates than Sweden (self-serving), being 95% vs 73% for total amount (g) in serving. Iceland more often had serving size between or above the half and full reference plates compared with Sweden.

Conclusions: The photographic method provides acceptable estimates of food and energy intake in school canteens. However, greater accuracy can be expected when foods are served by canteen staff compared with self-serving.

Citing Articles

A real-life snapshot: Evaluating exposures to low energy availability in male athletes from various sports.

Vardardottir B, Olafsdottir A, Gudmundsdottir S Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(12):e16112.

PMID: 38923409 PMC: 11194298. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.16112.

Evaluating the Validity of the PortionSize Smartphone Application for Estimating Dietary Intake in Free-Living Conditions: A Pilot Study.

Diktas H, Lozano C, Saha S, Broyles S, Martin C, Apolzan J J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024; 56(9):643-652.

PMID: 38888538 PMC: 11381165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.226.

Patterns of energy availability and carbohydrate intake differentiate between adaptable and problematic low energy availability in female athletes.

Vardardottir B, Gudmundsdottir S, Tryggvadottir E, Olafsdottir A Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1390558.

PMID: 38783864 PMC: 11111999. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1390558.

Validity of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Application to Identify Foods and Estimate Energy Intake Among Adults: A Pilot Study.

Lozano C, Canty E, Saha S, Broyles S, Beyl R, Apolzan J Curr Dev Nutr. 2023; 7(11):102009.

PMID: 38026571 PMC: 10656219. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102009.

Selecting foods from FNDDS when calculating food intake: Does the reference matter?.

Saha S, Lozano C, Broyles S, Apolzan J, Martin C J Food Compost Anal. 2023; 125.

PMID: 37954912 PMC: 10634654. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105733.

References

Higgins J, LaSalle A, Zhaoxing P, Kasten M, Bing K, Ridzon S . Validation of photographic food records in children: are pictures really worth a thousand words?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009; 63(8):1025-33. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.12. View

Krouwer J . Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med. 2007; 27(5):778-80. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3086. View

Lu A, Baranowski J, Islam N, Baranowski T . How to engage children in self-administered dietary assessment programmes. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012; 27 Suppl 1:5-9. PMC: 3883798. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01258.x. View

Jia W, Chen H, Yue Y, Li Z, Fernstrom J, Bai Y . Accuracy of food portion size estimation from digital pictures acquired by a chest-worn camera. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17(8):1671-81. PMC: 4152011. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013003236. View

Ptomey L, Willis E, Honas J, Mayo M, Washburn R, Herrmann S . Validity of energy intake estimated by digital photography plus recall in overweight and obese young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115(9):1392-9. PMC: 4555004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.006. View

Livingstone M, Robson P . Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000; 59(2):279-93. DOI: 10.1017/s0029665100000318. View

Waling M, Olafsdottir A, Lagstrom H, Wergedahl H, Jonsson B, Olsson C . School meal provision, health, and cognitive function in a Nordic setting - the ProMeal-study: description of methodology and the Nordic context. Food Nutr Res. 2016; 60:30468. PMC: 4981652. DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.30468. View

Giavarina D . Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015; 25(2):141-51. PMC: 4470095. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. View

Martin C, Han H, Coulon S, Allen H, Champagne C, Anton S . A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method. Br J Nutr. 2008; 101(3):446-56. PMC: 2626133. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508027438. View

10.

Livingstone M, Black A . Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr. 2003; 133 Suppl 3:895S-920S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.3.895S. View

11.

Gemming L, Utter J, Ni Mhurchu C . Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 115(1):64-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.09.015. View

12.

van Stralen K, Dekker F, Zoccali C, Jager K . Measuring agreement, more complicated than it seems. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012; 120(3):c162-7. DOI: 10.1159/000337798. View

13.

Japur C, Diez-Garcia R . Food energy content influences food portion size estimation by nutrition students. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010; 23(3):272-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01042.x. View

14.

Williamson D, Allen H, Martin P, Alfonso A, Gerald B, Hunt A . Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103(9):1139-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)00974-x. View

15.

Martin C, Newton Jr R, Anton S, Allen H, Alfonso A, Han H . Measurement of children's food intake with digital photography and the effects of second servings upon food intake. Eat Behav. 2007; 8(2):148-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.03.003. View

16.

Nicklas T, ONeil C, Stuff J, Goodell L, Liu Y, Martin C . Validity and feasibility of a digital diet estimation method for use with preschool children: a pilot study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44(6):618-23. PMC: 3764479. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.12.001. View

17.

Swanson M . Digital photography as a tool to measure school cafeteria consumption. J Sch Health. 2008; 78(8):432-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00326.x. View

18.

Masson L, McNeill G, Tomany J, Simpson J, Peace H, Wei L . Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic. Public Health Nutr. 2003; 6(3):313-21. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2002429. View

19.

Sabinsky M, Toft U, Andersen K, Tetens I . Validation of a digital photographic method for assessment of dietary quality of school lunch sandwiches brought from home. Food Nutr Res. 2013; 57. PMC: 3710933. DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v57i0.20243. View

20.

Burrows T, Martin R, Collins C . A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(10):1501-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.008. View