The Electrophysiology of Basic Phrase Building

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2016 Oct 7

PMID 27711111

Citations 6

Authors

Chris Neufeld

Stephanie E Kramer

Natalia Lapinskaya

Christopher C Heffner

Anton Malko

Ellen F Lau

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A defining trait of linguistic competence is the ability to combine elements into increasingly complex structures to denote, and to comprehend, a potentially infinite number of meanings. Recent magnetoencephalography (MEG) work has investigated these processes by comparing the response to nouns in combinatorial (blue car) and non-combinatorial (rnsh car) contexts. In the current study we extended this paradigm using electroencephalography (EEG) to dissociate the role of semantic content from phonological well-formedness (yerl car). We used event-related potential (ERP) recordings in order to better relate the observed neurophysiological correlates of basic combinatorial operations to prior ERP work on comprehension. We found that nouns in combinatorial contexts (blue car) elicited a greater centro-parietal negativity between 180-400ms, independent of the phonological well-formedness of the context word. We discuss the potential relationship between this 'combinatorial' effect and classic N400 effects. We also report preliminary evidence for an early anterior negative deflection immediately preceding the critical noun in combinatorial contexts, which we tentatively interpret as an electrophysiological reflex of syntactic structure initialization.

Citing Articles

Exploring the neurobiology of Merge at a basic level: insights from a novel artificial grammar paradigm.

Liu Y, Gao C, Wang P, Friederici A, Zaccarella E, Chen L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1151518.

PMID: 37287773 PMC: 10242141. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1151518.

Hierarchy, Not Lexical Regularity, Modulates Low-Frequency Neural Synchrony During Language Comprehension.

Lo C, Tung T, Ke A, Brennan J Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 3(4):538-555.

PMID: 37215342 PMC: 10158645. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00077.

Minimal Phrase Composition Revealed by Intracranial Recordings.

Murphy E, Woolnough O, Rollo P, Roccaforte Z, Segaert K, Hagoort P J Neurosci. 2022; 42(15):3216-3227.

PMID: 35232761 PMC: 8994536. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-21.2022.

Composition within and between Languages in the Bilingual Mind: MEG Evidence from Korean/English Bilinguals.

Phillips S, Pylkkanen L eNeuro. 2021; 8(6).

PMID: 34732542 PMC: 8570682. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0084-21.2021.

Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences.

Mascelloni M, Zamparelli R, Vespignani F, Gruber T, Mueller J Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:412.

PMID: 31866842 PMC: 6906200. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00412.

References

Kutas M, Hillyard S . Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980; 207(4427):203-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7350657. View

van Berkum J, Brown C, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P . Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(3):443-67. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443. View

Coch D, Mitra P . Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform. Brain Res. 2010; 1329:159-74. PMC: 2857552. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.084. View

Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Giard M, Echallier J, Pernier J . ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):235-60. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563373. View

Bemis D, Pylkkanen L . Simple composition: a magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(8):2801-14. PMC: 6623787. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-10.2011. View

Van Petten C, Luka B . Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain Lang. 2005; 97(3):279-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.003. View

Bai C, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I, Wang L, Hung Y, Schlesewsky M, Burkhardt P . Semantic composition engenders an N400: evidence from Chinese compounds. Neuroreport. 2008; 19(6):695-9. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fc1eb7. View

Corbetta M, Shulman G, Miezin F, Petersen S . Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science. 1995; 270(5237):802-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.270.5237.802. View

Van Petten C, Kutas M . Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Mem Cognit. 1991; 19(1):95-112. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198500. View

10.

Koenigs M, Barbey A, Postle B, Grafman J . Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(47):14980-6. PMC: 2799248. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009. View

11.

Rossell S, Price C, Nobre A . The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41(5):550-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00181-1. View

12.

Lau E, Phillips C, Poeppel D . A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9(12):920-33. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2532. View

13.

Ziegler J, Besson M, Jacobs A, Nazir T, Carr T . Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: a multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 9(6):758-75. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.758. View

14.

Lau E, Stroud C, Plesch S, Phillips C . The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain Lang. 2006; 98(1):74-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003. View

15.

Pylkkanen L, Bemis D, Blanco Elorrieta E . Building phrases in language production: an MEG study of simple composition. Cognition. 2014; 133(2):371-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.001. View

16.

Friederici A, Meyer M, von Cramon D . Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain Lang. 2001; 75(3):289-300. View

17.

Halgren E, Dhond R, Christensen N, Van Petten C, Marinkovic K, Lewine J . N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(3):1101-16. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1268. View

18.

Mazoyer B, Tzourio N, Frak V, Syrota A, Murayama N, Levrier O . The cortical representation of speech. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 5(4):467-79. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.467. View

19.

Bemis D, Pylkkanen L . Flexible composition: MEG evidence for the deployment of basic combinatorial linguistic mechanisms in response to task demands. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e73949. PMC: 3771885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073949. View

20.

Vandenberghe R, Nobre A, Price C . The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(4):550-60. DOI: 10.1162/08989290260045800. View