» Articles » PMID: 27709248

Two Injection Digital Block Versus Single Subcutaneous Palmar Injection Block for Finger Lacerations

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 7
PMID 27709248
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare two digital nerve block techniques in patients due to traumatic digital lacerations.

Methods: This was a randomized-controlled study designed prospectively in the emergency department of a university-based training and research hospital. Randomization was achieved by sealed envelopes. Half of the patients were randomised to traditional (two-injection) digital nerve block technique while single-injection digital nerve block technique was applied to the other half. Score of pain due to anesthetic infiltration and suturing, onset time of total anesthesia, need for an additional rescue injection were the parameters evaluated with both groups. Epinephrin added lidocaine hydrochloride preparation was used for the anesthetic application. Visual analog scale was used for the evaluation of pain scores. Outcomes were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test and Student t-test.

Results: Fifty emergency department patients ≥18 years requiring digital nerve block were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the patients was 33 (min-max: 19-86) and 39 (78 %) were male. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of our main parameters; anesthesia pain score, suturing pain score, onset time of total anesthesia and rescue injection need.

Conclusion: Single injection volar digital nerve block technique is a suitable alternative for digital anesthesias in emergency departments.

Citing Articles

Comparison of pain and extent of anesthesia in digital blocks for isolated finger lacerations: A randomized controlled trial.

Jarragh A, Lari A, Burhamah W, Alherz M, Nouri A, Alshammari Y Turk J Emerg Med. 2022; 22(3):125-130.

PMID: 35936956 PMC: 9355069. DOI: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_344_21.


Digital nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Borbon T, Qu P, Coleman-Satterfield T, Kearney R, Klein E J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022; 3(4):e12753.

PMID: 35795710 PMC: 9249376. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12753.


[Oberst's block anesthesia].

Saul D, Roch J, Lehmann W, Dresing K Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2019; 32(1):18-22.

PMID: 31650198 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-019-00633-y.


Updates in emergency department laceration management.

Otterness K, Singer A Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019; 6(2):97-105.

PMID: 30947489 PMC: 6614056. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.18.018.

References
1.
Williams J, Lalonde D . Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(5):1195-1200. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237016.00941.96. View

2.
Lalonde D, Wong A . Local Anesthetics: What's New in Minimal Pain Injection and Best Evidence in Pain Control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(4 Suppl 2):40S-49S. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000679. View

3.
Sener A, Demircan A, Keles A, Bildik F, Karakurt K . Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia and peripheral nerve block: a randomized prospective study in hand lacerations. Turk J Med Sci. 2015; 45(3):694-9. View

4.
Klein J . The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. 1990; 8(3):425-37. View

5.
Mann T, Hammert W . Epinephrine and hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(6):1254-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.022. View