» Articles » PMID: 27703810

Relatives to Critically Ill Patients Have No Sense of Coherence: A Quality Improvement Article Using Mixed Methods

Overview
Journal Nurs Res Pract
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Oct 6
PMID 27703810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. To investigate the relatives' satisfaction and involvement on a general surgery ward regarding the critically ill patient. . Relatives to critically ill patients are affected both physically and mentally during the hospitalization of a family member. Research has shown that relatives do not always receive the attention they need from health professionals. There is a lack of studies that focus on relatives' satisfaction and involvement during their family members' hospitalization. . A mixed methods design was chosen. . A quantitative study was conducted with 27 relatives to critically ill patients. All participated in a questionnaire and out of the 27 relatives, six participated in qualitative in-depth interviews. The questionnaire revealed that relatives were dissatisfied with care and involvement. For further exploration of the dissatisfaction, a qualitative approach was used and the in-depth interviews revealed three themes: lack of continuity and structure, responsibility of coordination, and relatives feeling left on their own with no guiding and support. Health professionals' key role in relation to relatives must be guidance and support. Thereby, relatives can gain a sense of coherence during the hospitalization of a critically ill patient, which can lead to a greater satisfaction and thereby better support for the patient.

References
1.
Altschuler A, Ramirez M, Grant M, Wendel C, Hornbrook M, Herrinton L . The influence of husbands' or male partners' support on women's psychosocial adjustment to having an ostomy resulting from colorectal cancer. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009; 36(3):299-305. PMC: 2806676. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181a1a1dc. View

2.
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D . Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46(12):1417-32. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n. View

3.
Larsson B . Patients' views on quality of care: age effects and identification of patient profiles. J Clin Nurs. 2000; 8(6):693-700. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00311.x. View

4.
Williams B . Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(4):509-16. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. View

5.
Benz C, Bull T, Mittelmark M, Vaandrager L . Culture in salutogenesis: the scholarship of Aaron Antonovsky. Glob Health Promot. 2014; 21(4):16-23. PMC: 4242901. DOI: 10.1177/1757975914528550. View