» Articles » PMID: 27703439

The Role of Intuition in the Generation and Evaluation Stages of Creativity

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Oct 6
PMID 27703439
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both intuition and creativity are associated with knowledge creation, yet a clear link between them has not been adequately established. First, the available empirical evidence for an underlying relationship between intuition and creativity is sparse in nature. Further, this evidence is arguable as the concepts are diversely operationalized and the measures adopted are often not validated sufficiently. Combined, these issues make the findings from various studies examining the link between intuition and creativity difficult to replicate. Nevertheless, the role of intuition in creativity should not be neglected as it is often reported to be a core component of the idea generation process, which in conjunction with idea evaluation are crucial phases of creative cognition. We review the prior research findings in respect of idea generation and idea evaluation from the view that intuition can be construed as the gradual accumulation of cues to coherence. Thus, we summarize the literature on what role intuitive processes play in the main stages of the creative problem-solving process and outline a conceptual framework of the interaction between intuition and creativity. Finally, we discuss the main challenges of measuring intuition as well as possible directions for future research.

Citing Articles

Naturalistic Decision-Making in Sport: How Current Advances Into Recognition Primed Decision Model Offer Insights for Future Research in Sport Settings?.

Bossard C, Kerivel T, Dugeny S, Bagot P, Fontaine T, Kermarrec G Front Psychol. 2022; 13:936140.

PMID: 35795439 PMC: 9252097. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936140.


Creativity Is Optimal Novelty and Maximal Positive Affect: A New Definition Based on the Spreading Activation Model.

Schubert E Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:612379.

PMID: 34113228 PMC: 8185022. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.612379.


Natural outbreaks and bioterrorism: How to deal with the two sides of the same coin?.

Koch L, Lopes A, Maiguy A, Guillier S, Guillier L, Tournier J J Glob Health. 2020; 10(2):020317.

PMID: 33110519 PMC: 7535343. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.020317.

References
1.
Simonton D . Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Phys Life Rev. 2010; 7(2):156-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002. View

2.
Wiggins G, Bhattacharya J . Mind the gap: an attempt to bridge computational and neuroscientific approaches to study creativity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:540. PMC: 4109440. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00540. View

3.
Jung-Beeman M, Bowden E, Haberman J, Frymiare J, Arambel-Liu S, Greenblatt R . Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(4):E97. PMC: 387268. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097. View

4.
Campbell D . Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol Rev. 1960; 67:380-400. DOI: 10.1037/h0040373. View

5.
Rietzschel E, Nijstad B, Stroebe W . The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. Br J Psychol. 2009; 101(Pt 1):47-68. DOI: 10.1348/000712609X414204. View