» Articles » PMID: 27694554

A Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Prostate Cancer

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 4
PMID 27694554
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the United States, prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men after skin cancer. There is a paucity of research devoted to the types of prostate cancer information available on social media outlets. YouTube™ is a widely used video sharing website, which is emerging as commonplace for information related to health. The purpose of this study was to describe the most widely viewed YouTube™ videos related to prostate cancer. The 100 videos were watched a total of 50,278,770 times. The majority of videos were uploaded by consumers (45.0%) and medical or government professionals (30%). The purpose of most videos (78.0%) was to provide information, followed by discussions of prostate cancer treatment (51%) and prostate-specific antigen testing and routine screening (26%). All videos uploaded by medical and government professionals and 93.8% of videos uploaded by news sources provided information compared with about two thirds of consumer and less than one half of commercial and advertisement videos ( p < .001). As society becomes increasingly technology-based, there is a need to help consumers acquire knowledge and skills to identify credible information to help inform their decisions.

Citing Articles

eHealth, digital information and technology use of men with prostate cancer.

Jackson S, Yu P, Sowter S, Occhipinti S, Chambers S, Leslie S Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076241309214.

PMID: 39801580 PMC: 11719434. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241309214.


Assessing universal considerations in infant mortality across the globe: A descriptive observational study of sudden infant death syndrome knowledge and reduction coverage on YouTube.

Jawed A, Hess A, Rye M, Ehrhardt C Health Promot Perspect. 2024; 14(3):248-257.

PMID: 39633624 PMC: 11612346. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.43055.


Cancer Prevention and Treatment on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning-Based Content Analysis Study.

Zhao K, Li X, Li J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55937.

PMID: 39141911 PMC: 11358654. DOI: 10.2196/55937.


YouTube and the implementation and discontinuation of the oral contraceptive pill: A mixed-method content analysis.

Niemann J, Wicherski L, Glaum L, Schenk L, Stadler G, Richter M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302316.

PMID: 38787833 PMC: 11125465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302316.


Is social media our new quitline? A descriptive study assessing youtube coverage of tobacco cessation.

Jawed A, Hogan A J Prev Med Hyg. 2024; 65(1):E25-E35.

PMID: 38706763 PMC: 11066827. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.1.3139.


References
1.
Gwede C, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J, Heysek R, Helal M, Shade K . Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 104(7):1381-90. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21330. View

2.
Prabhu V, Lee T, Loeb S, Holmes J, Gold H, Lepor H . Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU Int. 2014; 116(1):65-71. PMC: 4216238. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12748. View

3.
Lauckner C, Whitten P . The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction. J Cancer Educ. 2015; 31(3):449-52. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0881-5. View

4.
Steinberg P, Wason S, Stern J, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J . YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology. 2009; 75(3):619-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059. View

5.
Carter H, Albertsen P, Barry M, Etzioni R, Freedland S, Greene K . Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190(2):419-26. PMC: 4020420. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. View