» Articles » PMID: 27693450

Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 Ng/ml and Above

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Oct 4
PMID 27693450
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The 4-kallikrein panel, commercially available as the 4Kscore™, is a reflex test for prostate cancer early detection that has been extensively validated in multiple international cohorts. It has been suggested that use of such reflex tests be limited to those with prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination. We aimed to determine the value of the panel in men outside this "diagnostic gray zone."

Materials And Methods: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis using data from prior studies on the 4-kallikrein panel. We calculated the properties of the panel for predicting high grade (Gleason 7+) cancer in a subgroup of men with either positive digital rectal examination or prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml.

Results: A total 2,891 men from 8 cohorts were included. An important proportion of patients, including 32% in the United States validation study, had prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml or a positive digital rectal examination. For men with prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml the fixed-effects estimate for the discrimination of the kallikrein model was 0.84 vs 0.69 for the base model (difference 0.128, 95% CI 0.098-0.159). In the positive digital rectal examination group discrimination was 0.82 vs 0.72 (difference 0.092, 95% CI 0.069-0.115). Decision analysis showed a clinical net benefit for use of the panel in this subgroup with a reduction in biopsy rates of about 20% and only a small number of high grade cancers missed, or fewer than 3% of those not biopsied.

Conclusions: The use of the kallikrein panel in men with a positive digital rectal examination or prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml is justified.

Citing Articles

Predicting Grade group 2 or higher cancer at prostate biopsy by 4Kscore in blood and uCaP microRNA model in urine.

Fredsoe J, Rasmussen M, Tin A, Vickers A, Borre M, Sorensen K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):15193.

PMID: 36071094 PMC: 9452554. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19460-6.


UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Mason R, Marzouk K, Finelli A, Saad F, So A, Violette P Can Urol Assoc J. 2022; 16(4):E184-E196.

PMID: 35358414 PMC: 9054332. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7851.


Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.

Hamdy F, Donovan J, Athene Lane J, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(37):1-176.

PMID: 32773013 PMC: 7443739. DOI: 10.3310/hta24370.


Detection and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer Using Blood-Based Biomarkers.

Jin W, Fei X, Wang X, Song Y, Chen F Mediators Inflamm. 2020; 2020:8730608.

PMID: 32454797 PMC: 7218965. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8730608.


Accuracy of Tumour-Associated Circulating Endothelial Cells as a Screening Biomarker for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Bhakdi S, Suriyaphol P, Thaicharoen P, Grote S, Komoltri C, Chaiyaprasithi B Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(8).

PMID: 31357651 PMC: 6721410. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081064.


References
1.
Vickers A, Cronin A, Aus G, Pihl C, Becker C, Pettersson K . A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden. BMC Med. 2008; 6:19. PMC: 2474851. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-19. View

2.
Vickers A, Cronin A, Aus G, Pihl C, Becker C, Pettersson K . Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden. Cancer. 2010; 116(11):2612-20. PMC: 2882167. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25010. View

3.
Gupta A, Roobol M, Savage C, Peltola M, Pettersson K, Scardino P . A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Br J Cancer. 2010; 103(5):708-14. PMC: 2938258. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605815. View

4.
Vickers A, Cronin A, Roobol M, Savage C, Peltola M, Pettersson K . Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(15):2493-8. PMC: 2881727. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1968. View

5.
Vickers A, Elkin E . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-74. PMC: 2577036. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. View