» Articles » PMID: 27688267

Vessel Perforation During Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Technical Details and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Vessel perforation during stent retriever thrombectomy is a rare complication; typically only single instances have been reported.

Objective: To report on a series of patients whose stent retriever thrombectomy was complicated by intraprocedural vessel perforation and discuss its potential mechanisms, rescue treatment strategies, and clinical significance.

Methods: Cases with intraprocedural vessel perforation, where a stent retriever was used either as a primary treatment approach or as a part of a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT), were included in the final analysis. Clinical data, procedural details, radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected from nine participating centers.

Results: Intraprocedural vessel perforation during stent retriever thrombectomy occurred in 16 (1.0%) of 1599 cases. 63% of intraprocedural perforations occurred at distal locations. Endovascular rescue techniques (most commonly, intracranial balloon occlusion for tamponade) were attempted in 50% of cases. Procedure was aborted without any rescue attempts in 44% of cases. Mortality during hospitalization and at 3 months was 56% and 63%, respectively. 25% of patients achieved good functional outcome at 3 months after the procedure.

Conclusions: Intraprocedural perforations during stent retriever thrombectomy were rare, but when they occurred were associated with high mortality. Perforations most commonly occurred at distal occlusion sites and were often characterized by difficulty traversing the occlusion with a microcatheter or microwire, or while withdrawing the stent retriever. Nevertheless, 25% of patients had a favorable functional outcome, suggesting that in some patients with this complication good neurological recovery is achievable.

Citing Articles

The Usefulness of a 3D Roadmap of Occluded Vessels Created from Rapid 3D Proton Density-Weighted Imaging for Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Amano H, Tatsuta Y, Yamashita Y, Hashiguchi N, Yamaguchi Y, Oka K J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025; 19(1).

PMID: 40018276 PMC: 11864996. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.tn.2024-0044.


REtrieving thrombi and Separated Coils/catheters Unexpectedly detached during Endovascular therapy: RESCUE - the use of thrombectomy devices for rescue therapy in interventional neuroradiology.

Herlihy D, Singh S, Nicholson P, Griffin E, OHare A, Brennan P Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241299139.

PMID: 39699019 PMC: 11660110. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241299139.


Frictional forces in stent retriever procedures: The impact of vessel diameter, angulation, and deployment position.

Tsuto K, Takeuchi M, Shimizu Y, Matsumoto T, Iwabuchi S Surg Neurol Int. 2024; 15:384.

PMID: 39524599 PMC: 11544459. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_709_2024.


"Insights into vessel perforations during thrombectomy: Characteristics of a severe complication and the effect of thrombolysis".

Schulze-Zachau V, Rommers N, Ntoulias N, Brehm A, Krug N, Tsogkas I Eur Stroke J. 2024; :23969873241272542.

PMID: 39171391 PMC: 11569593. DOI: 10.1177/23969873241272542.


What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.

Bucke P, Cohen J, Horvath T, Cimpoca A, Bhogal P, Bazner H Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(10):340.

PMID: 39077121 PMC: 11267361. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2310340.