» Articles » PMID: 27678467

Recent Advances in Bird Sperm Morphometric Analysis and Its Role in Male Gamete Characterization and Reproduction Technologies

Overview
Journal Asian J Androl
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Sep 29
PMID 27678467
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postcopulatory sexual selection through sperm competition may be an important evolutionary force affecting many reproductive traits, including sperm morphometrics. Environmental factors such as pollutants, pesticides, and climate change may affect different sperm traits, and thus reproduction, in sensitive bird species. Many sperm-handling processes used in assisted reproductive techniques may also affect the size of sperm cells. The accurately measured dimensions of sperm cell structures (especially the head) can thus be used as indicators of environmental influences, in improving our understanding of reproductive and evolutionary strategies, and for optimizing assisted reproductive techniques (e.g., sperm cryopreservation) for use with birds. Computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis (CASA-Morph) provides an accurate and reliable method for assessing sperm morphometry, reducing the problem of subjectivity associated with human visual assessment. Computerized systems have been standardized for use with semen from different mammalian species. Avian spermatozoa, however, are filiform, limiting their analysis with such systems, which were developed to examine the approximately spherical heads of mammalian sperm cells. To help overcome this, the standardization of staining techniques to be used in computer-assessed light microscopical methods is a priority. The present review discusses these points and describes the sperm morphometric characteristics of several wild and domestic bird species.

Citing Articles

PFAS Exposure is Associated with a Lower Spermatic Quality in an Arctic Seabird.

Humann-Guilleminot S, Blevin P, Gabrielsen G, Herzke D, Nikiforov V, Jouanneau W Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(44):19617-19626.

PMID: 39441666 PMC: 11542889. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04495.


Factors determining semen sample collection and semen quality parameters in African penguins Spheniscus demersus.

Borecki P, Mucha A, Nizanski W, Partyka A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24261.

PMID: 39415048 PMC: 11484835. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76303-2.


Short-Term Storage of Rooster Ejaculates: Sperm Quality and Bacterial Profile Differences in Selected Commercial Extenders.

Tvrda E, Petrovicova M, duracka M, Benko F, Slanina T, Galovicova L Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37627704 PMC: 10451222. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081284.


The morphology, morphometry and functionality of fresh and cryopreserved wisent (Bison bonasus) epididymal spermatozoa.

Eberhardt M, Prochowska S, Partyka A, Bielas W, Van Soom A, Olech W Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13866.

PMID: 37620548 PMC: 10449768. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40798-y.


Changes in Sperm Morphology, Morphometry, and Motility from the Epididymis to the Vas Deferens in Rheas (, Linnaeus, 1758).

Bezerra L, Silva A, Jurema A, Dantas M, Pereira A, Oliveira M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37174520 PMC: 10177575. DOI: 10.3390/ani13091483.


References
1.
Sinha Hikim A, Swerdloff R . Hormonal and genetic control of germ cell apoptosis in the testis. Rev Reprod. 1999; 4(1):38-47. DOI: 10.1530/ror.0.0040038. View

2.
Boersma A, Braun J . [Computer-assisted analysis of sperm morphology in veterinary medicine]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1999; 112(3):81-5. View

3.
Cooper T, Atkinson A, Nieschlag E . Experience with external quality control in spermatology. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(3):765-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.765. View

4.
Korn N, Thurston R, Pooser B, Scott T . Ultrastructure of spermatozoa from Japanese quail. Poult Sci. 2000; 79(1):86-93. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.1.86. View

5.
Gravance C, Champion Z, Casey P . Computer-assisted sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2000; 49(6):1219-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00069-7. View