» Articles » PMID: 27671642

Neural Correlate of the Construction of Sentence Meaning

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Sep 28
PMID 27671642
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The neural processes that underlie your ability to read and understand this sentence are unknown. Sentence comprehension occurs very rapidly, and can only be understood at a mechanistic level by discovering the precise sequence of underlying computational and neural events. However, we have no continuous and online neural measure of sentence processing with high spatial and temporal resolution. Here we report just such a measure: intracranial recordings from the surface of the human brain show that neural activity, indexed by γ-power, increases monotonically over the course of a sentence as people read it. This steady increase in activity is absent when people read and remember nonword-lists, despite the higher cognitive demand entailed, ruling out accounts in terms of generic attention, working memory, and cognitive load. Response increases are lower for sentence structure without meaning ("Jabberwocky" sentences) and word meaning without sentence structure (word-lists), showing that this effect is not explained by responses to syntax or word meaning alone. Instead, the full effect is found only for sentences, implicating compositional processes of sentence understanding, a striking and unique feature of human language not shared with animal communication systems. This work opens up new avenues for investigating the sequence of neural events that underlie the construction of linguistic meaning.

Citing Articles

Decoding semantics from natural speech using human intracranial EEG.

Pescatore C, Zhang H, Hadjinicolaou A, Paulk A, Rolston J, Richardson R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990331 PMC: 11844374. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.10.637051.


Universality of representation in biological and artificial neural networks.

Hosseini E, Casto C, Zaslavsky N, Conwell C, Richardson M, Fedorenko E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39764030 PMC: 11703180. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.26.629294.


Hierarchical neural processing in γ oscillations for syntactic and semantic operations accounts for first- and second-language epistemology.

Dekydtspotter L, Miller A, Swanson K, Cha J, Xiong Y, Ahn J Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1372909.

PMID: 39376494 PMC: 11456458. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1372909.


Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows.

Regev T, Casto C, Hosseini E, Adamek M, Ritaccio A, Willie J Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(10):1924-1942.

PMID: 39187713 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01944-2.


Semantic encoding during language comprehension at single-cell resolution.

Jamali M, Grannan B, Cai J, Khanna A, Munoz W, Caprara I Nature. 2024; 631(8021):610-616.

PMID: 38961302 PMC: 11254762. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07643-2.


References
1.
Kutas M, Hillyard S . Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980; 207(4427):203-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7350657. View

2.
Bates E, Wilson S, Saygin A, Dick F, Sereno M, Knight R . Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(5):448-50. DOI: 10.1038/nn1050. View

3.
Cogan G, Thesen T, Carlson C, Doyle W, Devinsky O, Pesaran B . Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally. Nature. 2014; 507(7490):94-8. PMC: 4000028. DOI: 10.1038/nature12935. View

4.
Noppeney U, Price C . An FMRI study of syntactic adaptation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(4):702-13. DOI: 10.1162/089892904323057399. View

5.
Levy R . Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition. 2007; 106(3):1126-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006. View