» Articles » PMID: 27670649

Esophageal Bougination: a Novel Ex Vivo Endoscopic Training Model Correlated with Clinical Data

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Sep 28
PMID 27670649
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esophageal bougination is a worldwide standard endoscopic procedure. Clinical methods and recommendations are based on clinical experiences only. Mechanical properties have never been described. Aim of the study was to establish a realistic ex vivo training model. Therefore, detailed assessment of relevant mechanical features of esophageal bougination should be evaluated ex vivo and in patient setting and correlated against.

Patients And Methods: A three-step concept was used to evaluate mechanical properties at stenosis level. First, insertion forces were evaluated in an ex vivo linear single stenosis model during steady mechanical insertion. Second, adding friction and properties of the pharynx and upper esophagus, the model was integrated in an artificial endoscopic training model (ELITE training model). Third, in vivo measurements were taken to correlate ex vivo data with parameters of a realistic patient setting.

Results: With the presented setup, we were able to assess insertion force and pressure levels in an artificial stricture using different sizes of commercially available standard bougies. In all models, there was a relevant increase in insertion force with higher stricture pressure levels. Insertion force levels in the ELITE model show higher levels compared to the linear stenosis model. Having regard to the maximum forces in patients, there is also a constant increase in mean insertion force according to higher bougie sizes, but lower forces were measured as in the ELITE model.

Discussion: The applied models are suitable to appraise mechanical properties of esophageal bougination in an ex vivo model and patient setting. Forces could be constituted reliable, significant increase was documented according to stenosis level and results were comparable to patient data. This was comparable to patient data. Further clinical evaluation in different kinds of stenosis is necessary.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic submucosal dissection training: evaluation of an ex vivo training model with continuous perfusion (ETM-CP) for hands-on teaching and training in China.

Huang J, Du B, Qiao W, Huang S, Xue L, Deng L Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(6):4774-4783.

PMID: 36914780 PMC: 10234865. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09940-9.

References
1.
Quine M, Bell G, McCloy R, Matthews H . Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England. Br J Surg. 1995; 82(4):530-3. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820430. View

2.
Hernandez L, Jacobson J, Harris M, Hernandez L . Comparison among the perforation rates of Maloney, balloon, and savary dilation of esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51(4 Pt 1):460-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70448-2. View

3.
Gillen S, Wilhelm D, Meining A, Fiolka A, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A . The "ELITE" model: construct validation of a new training system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy. 2009; 41(5):395-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214620. View

4.
McLean G, Leveen R . Shear stress in the performance of esophageal dilation: comparison of balloon dilation and bougienage. Radiology. 1989; 172(3 Pt 2):983-6. DOI: 10.1148/172.3.983. View

5.
Clouse R . Complications of endoscopic gastrointestinal dilation techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996; 6(2):323-41. View