Modified Right Heart Contrast Echocardiography Versus Traditional Method in Diagnosis of Right-to-Left Shunt: A Comparative Study

Overview

Journal Pol J Radiol

Publisher Termedia

Specialty Radiology

Date 2016 Sep 27

PMID 27668027

Authors

Yi Wang

Jie Zeng

Lixue Yin

Mei Zhang

Dailun Hou

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, effectiveness, and safety of modified right heart contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) in comparison with the traditional method.

Material/methods: We performed a modified right heart cTTE using saline mixed with a small sample of patient's own blood. Samples were agitated with varying intensity. This study protocol involved microscopic analysis and patient evaluation. 1. Microscopic analysis: After two contrast samples had been agitated 10 or 20 times, they underwent a comparison of bubble size, bubble number, and red blood cell morphology. 2. Patient analysis: 40 patients with suspected RLS (right- to-left shunt) were enrolled. All patients underwent right heart contrast echocardiography. Oxygen saturation, transit time and duration, presence of RLS, change in indirect bilirubin and urobilinogen concentrations were compared afterward.

Results: Modified method generated more bubbles (P<0.05), but the differences in bubble size were not significant (P>0.05). Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with RLS (60%) using the modified method compared to 16 patients (40%) with the traditional method. The transit time of ASb20 group was the shortest (P<0.05). However, the duration time in this group was much longer (P<0.05). Also, in semi-quantitative analysis mean rank of RLS was higher after injecting the modified contrast agent agitated 20 times (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Modified right heart contrast echocardiography is a reliable, effective and safe method of detecting cardiovascular RLS.

References

Soliman O, Geleijnse M, Meijboom F, Nemes A, Kamp O, Nihoyannopoulos P . The use of contrast echocardiography for the detection of cardiac shunts. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007; 8(3):S2-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.euje.2007.03.006. View

Lefevre J, Lafitte S, Reant P, Perron J, Roudaut R . Optimization of patent foramen ovale detection by contrast transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008; 101(4):213-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1875-2136(08)73695-7. View

Lang R, Bierig M, Devereux R, Flachskampf F, Foster E, Pellikka P . Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of.... J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18(12):1440-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005. View

Gossage J . The role of echocardiography in screening for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. Chest. 2003; 123(2):320-2. DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.2.320. View

Quinones M, Otto C, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi W . Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15(2):167-84. DOI: 10.1067/mje.2002.120202. View

Nagueh S, Appleton C, Gillebert T, Marino P, Oh J, Smiseth O . Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22(2):107-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023. View

Fan S, Nagai T, Luo H, Atar S, Naqvi T, Birnbaum Y . Superiority of the combination of blood and agitated saline for routine contrast enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999; 12(2):94-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(99)70120-3. View

Rana B, Thomas M, Calvert P, Monaghan M, Hildick-Smith D . Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(7):749-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.01.007. View

Bartz P, Cetta F, Cabalka A, Reeder G, Squarcia U, Agnetti A . Paradoxical emboli in children and young adults: role of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81(5):615-8. DOI: 10.4065/81.5.615. View

10.

Homma S, Sacco R, Di Tullio M, Sciacca R, Mohr J . Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study. Circulation. 2002; 105(22):2625-31. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000017498.88393.44. View

11.

Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E, Mackey-Bojack S, Titus J, Reisman M . Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(9):1768-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.038. View

12.

Droste D, Lakemeier S, Wichter T, Stypmann J, Dittrich R, Ritter M . Optimizing the technique of contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to-left shunts. Stroke. 2002; 33(9):2211-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000027884.03365.ac. View

13.

Sastry S, Daly K, Chengodu T, McCollum C . Is transcranial Doppler for the detection of venous-to-arterial circulation shunts reproducible?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23(5-6):424-9. DOI: 10.1159/000101466. View

14.

Patti G, Pelliccia F, Gaudio C, Greco C . Meta-analysis of net long-term benefit of different therapeutic strategies in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 115(6):837-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.051. View

15.

Lechat P, Mas J, Lascault G, Loron P, Theard M, Klimczac M . Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318(18):1148-52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198805053181802. View

16.

Kernan W, Ovbiagele B, Black H, Bravata D, Chimowitz M, Ezekowitz M . Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45(7):2160-236. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. View

17.

White Jr R, Pollak J, Wirth J . Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: diagnosis and transcatheter embolotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996; 7(6):787-804. DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)70851-5. View

18.

Pinto F . When and how to diagnose patent foramen ovale. Heart. 2005; 91(4):438-40. PMC: 1768819. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.052233. View

19.

Job F, Ringelstein E, Grafen Y, Flachskampf F, Doherty C, Stockmanns A . Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74(4):381-4. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90407-3. View

20.

Marriott K, Manins V, Forshaw A, Wright J, Pascoe R . Detection of right-to-left atrial communication using agitated saline contrast imaging: experience with 1162 patients and recommendations for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012; 26(1):96-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.09.007. View