» Articles » PMID: 27664069

Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density and Dietary Intake of β-carotene, Vitamin C, Zinc and Vegetables in Postmenopausal Korean Women: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal J Int Med Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Sep 25
PMID 27664069
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective To examine the relationship between nutritional intake and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal Korean women. Methods Dietary intake was recorded in postmenopausal Korean women using a semiquantitative questionnaire. The frequency of consumption of various food groups and nutrient intake were calculated. BMD T-scores were measured at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Associations between T-scores and dietary intake were analysed using partial correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analysis. Results A total of 189 postmenopausal women were included in the study. β-Carotene intake was positively correlated with the lumbar spine T-score. Sodium and vitamin C intake were positively associated and folate intake negatively associated with the femoral neck T-score. Sodium, zinc and vitamin C intake were positively correlated and potassium intake was negatively correlated with the total hip T-score. Vegetable intake showed a positive association with the femoral neck and total hip T-scores. Conclusion In postmenopausal Korean women, β-carotene, vitamin C, zinc and sodium intakes were positively associated with bone mass. Furthermore, frequency of vegetable consumption was positively associated with femoral neck and total hip T-scores.

Citing Articles

Impact of the dietary antioxidant index on bone mineral density gain among mexican adults: a prospective study.

Jimenez-Ortega R, Lopez-Perez T, Becerra-Cervera A, Aparicio-Bautista D, Patino N, Salas-Martinez G Arch Osteoporos. 2025; 20(1):38.

PMID: 40067600 PMC: 11897103. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-025-01518-3.


Association between dietary zinc intake amount and prevalence of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study.

Zhang X, Zhang J, Shen L, Ni B, Wang C Ir J Med Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 39960598 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-025-03910-x.


Evaluation of bone-protecting effects of palm carotene mixture in two- and three-dimensional osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture systems.

Yee M, Chin K, Ima-Nirwana S, Alias E, Chua K, Wong S Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(3):585-603.

PMID: 39898246 PMC: 11783079. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.103445.


Bone mineral density parameters and related nutritional factors in vegans, lacto-ovo-vegetarians, and omnivores: a cross-sectional study.

Galchenko A, Rizzo G, Sidorova E, Skliar E, Baroni L, Visaggi P Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1390773.

PMID: 38919395 PMC: 11196821. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1390773.


Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods: A Comprehensive Review of Their Role in Bone Health.

Faienza M, Giardinelli S, Annicchiarico A, Chiarito M, Barile B, Corbo F Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38892062 PMC: 11172758. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115873.


References
1.
Okubo H, Sasaki S, Horiguchi H, Oguma E, Miyamoto K, Hosoi Y . Dietary patterns associated with bone mineral density in premenopausal Japanese farmwomen. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83(5):1185-92. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.1185. View

2.
Genuis S, Schwalfenberg G . Picking a bone with contemporary osteoporosis management: nutrient strategies to enhance skeletal integrity. Clin Nutr. 2006; 26(2):193-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.08.004. View

3.
Heaney R . Role of dietary sodium in osteoporosis. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006; 25(3 Suppl):271S-276S. DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719577. View

4.
Lowe N, Fraser W, Jackson M . Is there a potential therapeutic value of copper and zinc for osteoporosis?. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002; 61(2):181-5. DOI: 10.1079/PNS2002154. View

5.
Gjesdal C, Vollset S, Ueland P, Refsum H, Drevon C, Gjessing H . Plasma total homocysteine level and bone mineral density: the Hordaland Homocysteine Study. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(1):88-94. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.1.88. View