Article: Using Experimental Auctions to Examine Demand for E-Cigarettes

Background: E-cigarettes are the latest in a line of potentially reduced exposure products that have garnered interest among smokers.

Methods: In this paper, we use experimental auctions to estimate smokers' demand for e-cigarettes and to assess the impact of advertisements on willingness to pay. These are actual auctions, with winners and losers, which means hypothetical biases often seen in surveys are minimized.

Results: We find smokers have positive demand for e-cigarettes, and that the print advertisements used in our study had greater effectiveness than video ads (b = 2.00, p < .05) in terms of increasing demand for disposable e-cigarettes. Demand was greater for reusable versus disposable e-cigarettes. In multivariate models, demand for e-cigarettes was higher among non-white participants and among smokers willing to pay more for cigarettes.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that cigarette smokers are interested in e-cigarettes as alternatives to traditional products, particularly for reusable forms, and that this demand can be influenced by messaging/advertising.

Implications: Given these reduced harm products are appealing, if smokers are able to switch completely to e-cigarettes, there is a good chance for accrual of significant harm reduction.

Citing Articles

Which smokers adopt e-cigarettes and at what price? An experimental estimation of price elasticity of demand and factors correlated with e-cigarette adoption.

Corrigan J, OConnor R, Rousu M Addict Behav. 2020; 105:106324.

PMID: 32045835 PMC: 7050403. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106324.

The impact of flavors, health risks, secondhand smoke and prices on young adults' cigarette and e-cigarette choices: a discrete choice experiment.

Buckell J, Sindelar J Addiction. 2019; 114(8):1427-1435.

PMID: 30866132 PMC: 6639008. DOI: 10.1111/add.14610.

Cigarette and e-liquid demand and substitution in e-cigarette-naïve smokers.

Stein J, Koffarnus M, Stepanov I, Hatsukami D, Bickel W Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(3):233-243.

PMID: 29863381 PMC: 5991482. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000192.

E-Cigarette Marketing and Communication: How E-Cigarette Companies Market E-Cigarettes and the Public Engages with E-cigarette Information.

Collins L, Glasser A, Abudayyeh H, Pearson J, Villanti A Nicotine Tob Res. 2018; 21(1):14-24.

PMID: 29315420 PMC: 6610165. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx284.

Effect of brand and advertising medium on demand for e-cigarettes: Evidence from an experimental auction.

Rousu M, OConnor R, Corrigan J Prev Med Rep. 2017; 7:11-15.

PMID: 28540162 PMC: 5432678. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.04.013.

References

1.

Arrazola R, Neff L, Kennedy S, Holder-Hayes E, Jones C . Tobacco use among middle and high school students--United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63(45):1021-6. PMC: 5779497. View

2.

Villanti A, Rath J, Williams V, Pearson J, Richardson A, Abrams D . Impact of Exposure to Electronic Cigarette Advertising on Susceptibility and Trial of Electronic Cigarettes and Cigarettes in US Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 18(5):1331-9. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv235. View

3.

Thrasher J, Rousu M, Anaya-Ocampo R, Reynales-Shigematsu L, Arillo-Santillan E, Hernandez-Avila M . Estimating the impact of different cigarette package warning label policies: the auction method. Addict Behav. 2007; 32(12):2916-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.018. View

4.

Wills T, Sargent J, Knight R, Pagano I, Gibbons F . E-cigarette use and willingness to smoke: a sample of adolescent non-smokers. Tob Control. 2015; 25(e1):e52-9. PMC: 4840020. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052349. View

5.

Friedman A . How does electronic cigarette access affect adolescent smoking?. J Health Econ. 2015; 44:300-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.003. View

6.

OConnor R, June K, Bansal-Travers M, Rousu M, Thrasher J, Hyland A . Estimating demand for alternatives to cigarettes with online purchase tasks. Am J Health Behav. 2013; 38(1):103-13. PMC: 3776309. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.38.1.11. View

7.

Huang J, Kim Y, Vera L, Emery S . Electronic Cigarettes Among Priority Populations: Role of Smoking Cessation and Tobacco Control Policies. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 50(2):199-209. PMC: 4718827. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.032. View

8.

Rousu M, OConnor R, Bansal-Travers M, Pitcavage J, Thrasher J . The impact of free trial acceptance on demand for alternative nicotine products: evidence from experimental auctions. Harm Reduct J. 2015; 12:18. PMC: 4468811. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-015-0052-3. View

9.

Farrelly M, Duke J, Crankshaw E, Eggers M, Lee Y, Nonnemaker J . A Randomized Trial of the Effect of E-cigarette TV Advertisements on Intentions to Use E-cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(5):686-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.010. View

10.

Thrasher J, Rousu M, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan J . Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and "plain" cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy. 2011; 102(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.06.003. View

11.

Monchuk D, Rousu M, Shogren J, Nonnemaker J, Kosa K . Decomposing the value of cigarettes using experimental auctions. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9(1):93-9. DOI: 10.1080/14622200601078392. View