» Articles » PMID: 27663238

I-mIBG Scintigraphy in Neuroblastoma: Development of a SIOPEN Semi-quantitative Reporting ,method by an International Panel

Overview
Date 2016 Sep 25
PMID 27663238
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A robust method is required to standardise objective reporting of diagnostic I-mIBG images in neuroblastoma. Prerequisites for an appropriate system are low inter- and intra-observer error and reproducibility across a broad disease spectrum. We present a new reporting method, developed and tested for SIOPEN by an international expert panel.

Method: Patterns of abnormal skeletal I-mIBG uptake were defined and assigned numerical scores [0-6] based on disease extent within 12 body segments. Uptake intensity was excluded from the analysis. Data sets from 82 patients were scored independently by six experienced specialists as unblinded pairs (pre- and post-induction chemotherapy) and in random order as a blinded study. Response was defined as ≥50 % reduction in post induction score compared with baseline.

Results: In total, 1968 image sets were reviewed individually. Response rates of 88 % and 82 % were recorded for patients with baseline skeletal scores ≤23 and 24-48 respectively, compared with 44 % response in patients with skeletal scores >48 (p = 0.02). Reducing the number of segments or extension scale had a small but statistically negative impact upon the number of responses detected. Intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] calculated for the unblinded and blinded study were 0.95 at diagnosis and 0.98 and 0.99 post-induction chemotherapy, respectively.

Conclusions: The SIOPEN mIBG score method is reproducible across the full spectrum of disease in high risk neuroblastoma. Numerical assessment of skeletal disease extent avoids subjective evaluation of uptake intensity. This robust approach provides a reliable means with which to examine the role of 123I mIBG scintigraphy as a prognostic indicator in neuroblastoma.

Citing Articles

The anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a phase 2 clinical trial.

Mora J, Chan G, Morgenstern D, Amoroso L, Nysom K, Faber J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1636.

PMID: 39952926 PMC: 11828896. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56619-x.


Application of modified Curie and SIOPEN skeleton scoring systems in F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT for neuroblastoma.

Li S, Sang B, Liu J, Liu Y, Xu Y, Sun X Ann Nucl Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39674843 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-02006-3.


Recommendations for the use of nuclear medicine imaging in patients with neuroblastoma.

Sanchez-Vano R, Balaguer J, Borrego-Dorado I, Esteban-Figueruelo A, Gamez C, Hladun R Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39508974 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03755-3.


Venetoclax plus cyclophosphamide and topotecan in heavily pre-treated relapsed metastatic neuroblastoma: a single center case series.

De Ioris M, Fabozzi F, Del Bufalo F, Del Baldo G, Villani M, Cefalo M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19295.

PMID: 37935707 PMC: 10630499. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44993-9.


Regorafenib plus Vincristine and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors: An Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Study.

Casanova M, Bautista F, Campbell-Hewson Q, Makin G, Marshall L, Verschuur A Clin Cancer Res. 2023; 29(21):4341-4351.

PMID: 37606641 PMC: 10618645. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0257.


References
1.
Boubaker A, Bischof Delaloye A . MIBG scintigraphy for the diagnosis and follow-up of children with neuroblastoma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 52(4):388-402. View

2.
Matthay K, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Giammarile F, Lewington V . Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. Br J Cancer. 2010; 102(9):1319-26. PMC: 2865749. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605621. View

3.
Olivier P, Colarinha P, Fettich J, Fischer S, Frokier J, Giammarile F . Guidelines for radioiodinated MIBG scintigraphy in children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003; 30(5):B45-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1138-9. View

4.
Huang S . Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol. 2000; 27(7):643-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00155-4. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View