» Articles » PMID: 27662279

Study 329 Continuation Phase: Safety and Efficacy of Paroxetine and Imipramine in Extended Treatment of Adolescent Major Depression

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2016 Sep 24
PMID 27662279
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This is an analysis of the unpublished continuation phase of Study 329, the primary objective of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and imipramine with placebo in the treatment of adolescents with unipolar major depression. The objectives of the continuation phase were to assess safety and relapse rates in the longer term. The objective of this publication, under the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative, was to see whether access to and analysis of the previously unpublished dataset from the continuation phase of this randomized controlled trial would have clinically relevant implications for evidence-based medicine.

Methods: The study was an eight-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with a six month continuation phase. The setting was 12 North American academic psychiatry centres, from 20 April 1994 to 15 February 1998. 275 adolescents with major depression were originally enrolled in Study 329, with 190 completing the eight-week acute phase. Of these, 119 patients (43%) entered the six-month continuation phase (paroxetine n = 49; imipramine n = 39; placebo n = 31), in which participants were continued on their current treatment, blinded. As per the protocol, we have looked at rates of relapse (based on Hamilton Depression Scale scores) across both acute and continuation phases, and generated a safety profile for paroxetine and imipramine compared with placebo for up to six months.ANOVA testing (generalized linear model) using a model including effects of site, treatment and site x treatment interaction was applied. Otherwise we used only descriptive statistics.

Results: Of patients entering the continuation phase, 15 of 49 for paroxetine (31%), 12 of 39 for imipramine (31%) and 12 of 31 for placebo (39%) completed as responders. Across the study, 25 patients on paroxetine relapsed (41% of those showing an initial response), 15 on imipramine (26%), and 10 on placebo (21%). In the continuation and taper phases combined there were 211 adverse events in the paroxetine group, 147 on imipramine and 100 on placebo. The taper phase had a higher proportion of severe adverse events per week of exposure than the acute phase, with the continuation phase having the fewest events.

Conclusions: The continuation phase did not offer support for longer-term efficacy of either paroxetine or imipramine. Relapse and adverse events on both active drugs open up the risks of a prescribing cascade. The previously largely unrecognised hazards of the taper phase have implications for prescribing practice and need further exploration.

Citing Articles

Industry influence on mental health research: depression as a case example.

Cosgrove L, Patterson E, Bursztajn H Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 10:1320304.

PMID: 38322498 PMC: 10845136. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1320304.


Treatment guesses in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study: Accuracy, unblinding and influence on outcomes.

Jureidini J, Moncrieff J, Klau J, Aboustate N, Raven M Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023; 58(4):355-364.

PMID: 38126083 PMC: 10960316. DOI: 10.1177/00048674231218623.


An examination of three prescribing cascades in a cohort of older adults with dementia.

Trenaman S, Bowles S, Kirkland S, Andrew M BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):297.

PMID: 33964882 PMC: 8106136. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02246-2.


Adjuvant-containing control arms in pivotal quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine trials: restoration of previously unpublished methodology.

Doshi P, Bourgeois F, Hong K, Jones M, Lee H, Shamseer L BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020; 25(6):213-219.

PMID: 32184277 PMC: 7691700. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111331.


Has evidence-based medicine ever been modern? A Latour-inspired understanding of a changing EBM.

Wieringa S, Engebretsen E, Heggen K, Greenhalgh T J Eval Clin Pract. 2017; 23(5):964-970.

PMID: 28508440 PMC: 5655926. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12752.

References
1.
Le Noury J, Nardo J, Healy D, Jureidini J, Raven M, Tufanaru C . Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence. BMJ. 2015; 351:h4320. PMC: 4572084. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4320. View

2.
Doshi P . Putting GlaxoSmithKline to the test over paroxetine. BMJ. 2013; 347:f6754. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6754. View

3.
Doshi P, Dickersin K, Healy D, Vedula S, Jefferson T . Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings. BMJ. 2013; 346:f2865. PMC: 3685516. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2865. View

4.
Keller M, Ryan N, Strober M, Klein R, Kutcher S, Birmaher B . Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001; 40(7):762-72. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200107000-00010. View

5.
Fawcett J, Epstein P, Fiester S, Elkin I, Autry J . Clinical management--imipramine/placebo administration manual. NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1987; 23(2):309-24. View