» Articles » PMID: 27658738

The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey

Overview
Journal EBioMedicine
Date 2016 Sep 24
PMID 27658738
Citations 423
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public trust in immunization is an increasingly important global health issue. Losses in confidence in vaccines and immunization programmes can lead to vaccine reluctance and refusal, risking disease outbreaks and challenging immunization goals in high- and low-income settings. National and international immunization stakeholders have called for better monitoring of vaccine confidence to identify emerging concerns before they evolve into vaccine confidence crises.

Methods: We perform a large-scale, data-driven study on worldwide attitudes to immunizations. This survey - which we believe represents the largest survey on confidence in immunization to date - examines perceptions of vaccine importance, safety, effectiveness, and religious compatibility among 65,819 individuals across 67 countries. Hierarchical models are employed to probe relationships between individual- and country-level socio-economic factors and vaccine attitudes obtained through the four-question, Likert-scale survey.

Findings: Overall sentiment towards vaccinations is positive across all 67 countries, however there is wide variability between countries and across world regions. Vaccine-safety related sentiment is particularly negative in the European region, which has seven of the ten least confident countries, with 41% of respondents in France and 36% of respondents in Bosnia & Herzegovina reporting that they disagree that vaccines are safe (compared to a global average of 13%). The oldest age group (65+) and Roman Catholics (amongst all faiths surveyed) are associated with positive views on vaccine sentiment, while the Western Pacific region reported the highest level of religious incompatibility with vaccines. Countries with high levels of schooling and good access to health services are associated with lower rates of positive sentiment, pointing to an emerging inverse relationship between vaccine sentiments and socio-economic status.

Conclusions: Regular monitoring of vaccine attitudes - coupled with monitoring of local immunization rates - at the national and sub-national levels can identify populations with declining confidence and acceptance. These populations should be prioritized to further investigate the drivers of negative sentiment and to inform appropriate interventions to prevent adverse public health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Text Messaging Nudging to Increase Coverage of Influenza Vaccination Among Older Adults in Norway (InfluSMS Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hansen B, Klungsoyr O, Labberton A, Saaksvuori L, Rydland K, Odeskaug L JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e63938.

PMID: 39998878 PMC: 11897661. DOI: 10.2196/63938.


[Childhood vaccination: doubts, ambiguities and decision-making in middle-class mothers in Argentina].

Mantilla M, Alonso J Cad Saude Publica. 2025; 41(1):e00010424.

PMID: 39936781 PMC: 11805512. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XES010424.


Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy: Validating the PACV Survey for Croatian Parents.

Curkovic A, Matana A Infect Dis Rep. 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39846706 PMC: 11755613. DOI: 10.3390/idr17010003.


Influences of Cultural Factors on Vaccination Practices Among Parents Prior to School Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Albalawi H, Rezq K Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75845.

PMID: 39822477 PMC: 11736233. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75845.


Vaccine hesitancy and consequences for vaccination coverage in children at 24 months of age, born in 2017-2018, living in the state capitals, Federal District and 12 inner region cities of Brazil.

Munhoz G, Silva A, Ramos Jr A, Franca A, Oliveira A, Boing A Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025; 33(spe2):e20231097.

PMID: 39813539 PMC: 11734594. DOI: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231097.especial2.en.


References
1.
Jones L, Sciamanna C, Lehman E . Are those who use specific complementary and alternative medicine therapies less likely to be immunized?. Prev Med. 2009; 50(3):148-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.12.001. View

2.
Ahmed Q, Nishtar S, Memish Z . Poliomyelitis in Pakistan: time for the Muslim world to step in. Lancet. 2013; 381(9877):1521-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60764-3. View

3.
Betsch C, Bohm R . Detrimental effects of introducing partial compulsory vaccination: experimental evidence. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 26(3):378-81. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv154. View

4.
Hanley S, Yoshioka E, Ito Y, Kishi R . HPV vaccination crisis in Japan. Lancet. 2015; 385(9987):2571. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61152-7. View

5.
Onnela J, Landon B, Kahn A, Ahmed D, Verma H, OMalley A . Polio vaccine hesitancy in the networks and neighborhoods of Malegaon, India. Soc Sci Med. 2016; 153:99-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.024. View