» Articles » PMID: 27657681

The Validation of Pharmacogenetics for the Identification of Fabry Patients to Be Treated with Migalastat

Abstract

Purpose: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the α-galactosidase A gene. Migalastat, a pharmacological chaperone, binds to specific mutant forms of α-galactosidase A to restore lysosomal activity.

Methods: A pharmacogenetic assay was used to identify the α-galactosidase A mutant forms amenable to migalastat. Six hundred Fabry disease-causing mutations were expressed in HEK-293 (HEK) cells; increases in α-galactosidase A activity were measured by a good laboratory practice (GLP)-validated assay (GLP HEK/Migalastat Amenability Assay). The predictive value of the assay was assessed based on pharmacodynamic responses to migalastat in phase II and III clinical studies.

Results: Comparison of the GLP HEK assay results in in vivo white blood cell α-galactosidase A responses to migalastat in male patients showed high sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (≥0.875). GLP HEK assay results were also predictive of decreases in kidney globotriaosylceramide in males and plasma globotriaosylsphingosine in males and females. The clinical study subset of amenable mutations (n = 51) was representative of all 268 amenable mutations identified by the GLP HEK assay.

Conclusion: The GLP HEK assay is a clinically validated method of identifying male and female Fabry patients for treatment with migalastat.Genet Med 19 4, 430-438.

Citing Articles

Status and frontiers of Fabre disease.

Chu W, Chen M, Lv X, Lu S, Wang C, Yin L Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025; 20(1):123.

PMID: 40075521 PMC: 11905648. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-025-03646-y.


Overcoming Resistance in Anderson-Fabry Disease: Current Therapeutic Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Carella M, Forleo C, Caretto P, Naccarati M, Dentamaro I, Dicorato M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685654 PMC: 11641994. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237195.


Pharmacokinetic evaluation of single-dose migalastat in non-Fabry disease subjects with ESRD receiving dialysis treatment, and use of modeling to select dose regimens in Fabry disease subjects with ESRD receiving dialysis treatment.

Johnson F, Wu S, Schmith G, Williams H, Rutecki J, Halabi A PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314030.

PMID: 39636942 PMC: 11620666. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314030.


Glycosphingolipids and their impact on platelet activity in a murine model of fabry disease.

Kanack A, Prodoehl E, Ishihara-Aoki M, Aoki K, Dahms N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29488.

PMID: 39604471 PMC: 11603304. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80633-6.


Biochemical Amenability in Fabry Patients Under Chaperone Therapy-How and When to Test?.

Lenders M, Menke E, Brand E BioDrugs. 2024; 38(6):845-854.

PMID: 39343861 PMC: 11530494. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x.


References
1.
Eng C, Banikazemi M, Gordon R, Goldman M, Phelps R, Kim L . A phase 1/2 clinical trial of enzyme replacement in fabry disease: pharmacokinetic, substrate clearance, and safety studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 68(3):711-22. PMC: 1274483. DOI: 10.1086/318809. View

2.
Barisoni L, Jennette J, Colvin R, Sitaraman S, Bragat A, Castelli J . Novel quantitative method to evaluate globotriaosylceramide inclusions in renal peritubular capillaries by virtual microscopy in patients with fabry disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012; 136(7):816-24. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0350-OA. View

3.
Germain D, Hughes D, Nicholls K, Bichet D, Giugliani R, Wilcox W . Treatment of Fabry's Disease with the Pharmacologic Chaperone Migalastat. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(6):545-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510198. View

4.
Khanna R, Soska R, Lun Y, Feng J, Frascella M, Young B . The pharmacological chaperone 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin reduces tissue globotriaosylceramide levels in a mouse model of Fabry disease. Mol Ther. 2009; 18(1):23-33. PMC: 2839206. DOI: 10.1038/mt.2009.220. View

5.
Brady R, GAL A, Bradley R, MARTENSSON E, Warshaw A, LASTER L . Enzymatic defect in Fabry's disease. Ceramidetrihexosidase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1967; 276(21):1163-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196705252762101. View