» Articles » PMID: 27656627

The Effects of Compression Garments and Electrostimulation on Athletes' Muscle Soreness and Recovery

Overview
Journal J Exerc Rehabil
Date 2016 Sep 23
PMID 27656627
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, we explained the effects of compression garment and electrostimulation on athletes' recovery period by evaluating blood lactate and isokinetic peak torque parameters. Twenty volunteers (15.55± 0.51 yr) were included to study. At recovery period, blood samples was taken for lactate values at 0th, 3rd, 5th, 15th, 30th min. The isokinetic strength test was performed on right ankle at 15th min and on the left ankle at 30th min. The same protocol was performed for compression garment on 2 weeks and for electrostimulation on third weeks and results were compared. There wasn't any significant difference on blood lactate levels within groups. At women; there was not any significant difference on isokinetic peak torques within two groups. but at electro-stimulation usage we found significant increases on right plantar flexion (P<0.1), right dorsal flexion (RDF) (P<0.1) and left plantar flexion (LPF) (P<0.1) values compared to control measurements. At men; with compression garment usage, there was significant increase on LPF values compared to control measurements. At electrostimulation usage, we found significant increases on RDF (P<0.1) and left dorsal flexion (P<0.1) values compared to control measurements. During recovery, there is not any beneficial effect seen on blood lactate level within two groups. When compared to passive rest, compression garments and electrostimulation interventions effects on force generation capacity at recovery are statically significant. Also in terms of force generation capacity; usage of electrostimulation during 15 min and compression garments during 30 min were statically more significant.

Citing Articles

Putting the Squeeze on Compression Garments: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Weakley J, Broatch J, ORiordan S, Morrison M, Maniar N, Halson S Sports Med. 2021; 52(5):1141-1160.

PMID: 34870801 PMC: 9023423. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01604-9.


Impact of Active Recovery and Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Blood-Flow and Blood Lactate Removal in Healthy People.

Sanudo B, Bartolome D, Tejero S, Ponce-Gonzalez J, Loza J, Figueroa A Front Physiol. 2020; 11:310.

PMID: 32372971 PMC: 7179681. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00310.


Management of an iatrogenic injury to the tibial nerve in a 24-year-old hurdle runner.

Kowalska J, Grabowski R, Pigonska J, Domzalski M J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(8):3394-3403.

PMID: 29996692 PMC: 6134643. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518776061.

References
1.
Tessitore A, Meeusen R, Cortis C, Capranica L . Effects of different recovery interventions on anaerobic performances following preseason soccer training. J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21(3):745-50. DOI: 10.1519/R-20386.1. View

2.
Brooks G . The lactate shuttle during exercise and recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986; 18(3):360-8. DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198606000-00019. View

3.
Lattier G, Millet G, Martin A, Martin V . Fatigue and recovery after high-intensity exercise. Part II: Recovery interventions. Int J Sports Med. 2004; 25(7):509-15. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820946. View

4.
Jakeman J, Byrne C, Eston R . Lower limb compression garment improves recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in young, active females. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109(6):1137-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1464-0. View

5.
Hatta H . Oxidative removal of lactate after strenuous exercise. Ann Physiol Anthropol. 1990; 9(2):213-8. DOI: 10.2114/ahs1983.9.213. View