» Articles » PMID: 27653757

Predictors of Response to Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics in Individual Patients

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Sep 23
PMID 27653757
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Several disease-modifying therapies have been shown to ameliorate the disease course; however, the individual treatment response and the occurrence of adverse events remain highly unpredictable. In the last 2 decades, a multitude of studies have aimed to identify biomarkers that enable treatment allocation in the individual patient or subgroup of patients with regard to treatment efficacy and safety profile. Following a PubMed database search, we provide an overview on what is presently known about body fluid markers for the prediction of response to the currently approved MS therapeutics. We also discuss the potential use of biomarkers with regard to drug-induced adverse events. To date, only a few molecules have been introduced in clinical routine: anti-drug antibodies against interferon (IFN)-β and natalizumab that are associated with abolished drug levels and treatment failure; anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody index that allows risk stratification for the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but severe adverse event during natalizumab treatment; and serostatus of varicella zoster virus as screening examination prior to fingolimod therapy to prevent the infection. A few candidate biomarkers still need closer examination, such as type I IFN signature and T-helper cell (Th)-17 reactivity for prediction of IFN-β treatment response, L-selectin expression for prediction of natalizumab-associated PML, interleukin (IL)-21 levels for prediction of secondary autoimmunity after exposure to alemtuzumab, lymphocyte count with regard to PML risk while receiving dimethyl fumarate or N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for monitoring of cardiac side effects during mitoxantrone therapy.

Citing Articles

Absence of B Cells in Brainstem and White Matter Lesions Associates With Less Severe Disease and Absence of Oligoclonal Bands in MS.

Fransen N, de Jong B, Hess K, Kuhlmann T, Vincenten M, Hamann J Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021; 8(2).

PMID: 33504635 PMC: 7862088. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000955.


Molecular biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.

Ziemssen T, Akgun K, Bruck W J Neuroinflammation. 2019; 16(1):272.

PMID: 31870389 PMC: 6929340. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-019-1674-2.


Assessing the Metabolomic Profile of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Interferon Beta 1a by H-NMR Spectroscopy.

Lorefice L, Murgia F, Fenu G, Frau J, Coghe G, Murru M Neurotherapeutics. 2019; 16(3):797-807.

PMID: 30820880 PMC: 6694336. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-019-00721-8.


The effect of disease modifying therapies on CD62L expression in multiple sclerosis.

Voortman M, Greiner P, Moser D, Stradner M, Graninger W, Moser A Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018; 4(3):2055217318800810.

PMID: 30263146 PMC: 6149021. DOI: 10.1177/2055217318800810.


'No evidence of disease activity' - is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis?.

Hegen H, Bsteh G, Berger T Eur J Neurol. 2018; 25(9):1107-e101.

PMID: 29687559 PMC: 6099351. DOI: 10.1111/ene.13669.


References
1.
Dhib-Jalbut S, Sumandeep S, Valenzuela R, Ito K, Patel P, Rametta M . Immune response during interferon beta-1b treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis who experienced relapses and those who were relapse-free in the START study. J Neuroimmunol. 2012; 254(1-2):131-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.08.012. View

2.
Sominanda A, Hillert J, Fogdell-Hahn A . In vivo bioactivity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients with neutralising antibodies is titre-dependent. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 79(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.122549. View

3.
Panitch H, Miller A, Paty D, Weinshenker B . Interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive MS: results from a 3-year controlled study. Neurology. 2004; 63(10):1788-95. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000146958.77317.3e. View

4.
. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69(3):89-95. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989. View

5.
Martinez-Rodriguez J, Lopez-Botet M, Munteis E, Rio J, Roquer J, Montalban X . Natural killer cell phenotype and clinical response to interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunol. 2011; 141(3):348-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.09.006. View