» Articles » PMID: 27651898

Improving Communication Between Phlebotomists and Doctors: a Quality Improvement Project

Overview
Date 2016 Sep 22
PMID 27651898
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management. Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists reported a lack of communication and standardised practice across the wards. Resulting delays in obtaining blood test results can impact detrimentally on patient safety and management. We designed a survey which highlighted inefficient handovers and discrepancies between wards as driving factors behind this. We therefore aimed to improve communication between phlebotomists and doctors, as well as the overall organisation of the service. This took the form of the "Phlebotomy Box," a box file system offering a set location for blood stickers to be situated. The box concept was optimised on a series of medical and surgical wards, incorporating multidisciplinary feedback from relevant teams. We measured how many untaken bloods were handed over to medical staff continuously, both pre- and post implementation of the phlebotomy box. Our baseline ward demonstrated poor handover rates of untaken bloods, ranging from 0% to 40%. This increased to a consistent 100% following introduction of the Phlebotomy Box and ongoing staff education. Once optimised, the box was trialled on a further two medical wards and one surgical ward, achieving 100% handover from an initial 0% to 67%. Quantitative improvement was also reflected qualitatively in widespread staff surveys, with overwhelmingly positive support and acceptance. In summary, the Phlebotomy Box innovation has led to 100% of untaken bloods being effectively handed over. We have demonstrated a significant improvement in communication and efficiency within the phlebotomy service, with tangible benefits to patient care, as minimising time lags can prevent delays in clinical decisions. The phlebotomy box represents a simplistic, sustainable intervention that could be easily replicated in other Trusts.

Citing Articles

Initiative to improve handover notes in a tertiary psychiatric hospital.

Ying J, Zhang M, Tan G, Low L, Fang T BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38388025 PMC: 10882377. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002601.


Rational use of antibiotics for major elective gynaecological and obstetrical surgical procedures: quality improvement journey from a tertiary care public facility.

Puri M, Nain S, Gautam A, Chaudhary V, Jaiswal N, Gs T BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(Suppl 1).

PMID: 35545270 PMC: 9092174. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001438.


Safe preoperative regional nerve blocks.

Arbizo J, Dalal K, Lao V, Rosinia F, Adejuyigbe T BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35012932 PMC: 8753394. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001370.


To improve the communication between a community mental health team and its service users, their families and carers.

Chowdhury P, Tari A, Hill O, Shah A BMJ Open Qual. 2020; 9(4).

PMID: 33154096 PMC: 7646348. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000914.


Handover checklist: testing a standardization process in an Italian hospital.

Ferorelli D, Giandola T, Laterza M, Solarino B, Pezzolla A, Zotti F Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2017; 10:87-93.

PMID: 28579841 PMC: 5449138. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S129652.

References
1.
Pitchforth J, Lemer C . Improving the use of phlebotomy services in a paediatric inpatient setting. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016; 2(2). PMC: 4663847. DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202230.w1115. View

2.
Shouls G, Jarrar Z, Wickenden J . Improving phlebotomy handover to doctors: a quality improvement project. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016; 3(1). PMC: 4645808. DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204813.w2033. View

3.
Brown E, Jarrett H, Churchhouse G, Hartley M, Cohen D, Kyprianou K . Improving phlebotomy handover of untaken blood tests to junior doctors. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016; 4(1). PMC: 4693092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206278.w3267. View