» Articles » PMID: 27651852

Disproportionate Availability Between Emergency and Elective Hand Coverage: A National Trend?

Overview
Journal Eplasty
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Sep 22
PMID 27651852
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Traumatic hand injuries represent approximately 20% of emergency department visits; yet, access to emergency care remains inadequate. Recent surveys from several states report a wider availability of hand specialists providing elective care than emergency care. The authors aim to examine this phenomenon in the state of New Jersey and whether there is a national trend toward disproportionate availability between emergency and elective hand coverage.

Methods: A survey was conducted of all New Jersey hospitals, excepting university hospitals, in August 2014. To assess the availability of hand surgery coverage, the following questions were asked: (1) Does your hospital provide elective hand surgery? and (2) Is there a hand specialist/surgeon on call always, sometimes, or never?

Results: A total of 58 hospitals were called, with a 67.2% response rate (n = 39). The majority (87.2%) of hospitals offered elective hand surgery, whereas only 64.1% provided immediate 24/7 hand coverage. Only 38.5% of hospitals located in the same county as a level I trauma center provided 24/7 emergency hand care, whereas 76.9% of hospitals in counties without any level I trauma center did (P < .05). Cities with a higher poverty level were less likely to provide emergency coverage than cities with a lower poverty level (47.4% vs 80.0%; P < .05).

Conclusions: There is a discrepancy between emergency and elective hand care in New Jersey. Similar findings across the nation suggest a concerning trend of limited access to emergency hand health care. Alternative systems that can appropriately triage and treat patients are warranted.

Citing Articles

Hand in hand with healthcare: A nationwide analysis of emergency department encounters for hand ailments.

Peluso H, Parikh S, Abougergi M, Walchak A J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 63:102943.

PMID: 40070523 PMC: 11891698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102943.


A feasibility model for restructuring the role of the hand surgeon taking call at a level I trauma center.

Sultan D, Rothchild E, Atamian E, OConnor P, Ricci J, Kasabian A J Hand Microsurg. 2024; 16(5):100145.

PMID: 39669723 PMC: 11632805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100145.


A National Survey of Hand Surgeons: Understanding the Rural Landscape.

Meyerson J, Liechty A, Shields T, Netscher D Hand (N Y). 2021; 18(4):686-691.

PMID: 34963333 PMC: 10233637. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211058811.


Firework injuries are increasing in the United States: An analysis of the National Emergency Department Sample.

Bitter C, Zhang Z, Talbert A, Weber A, Hinyard L J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 2(6):e12600.

PMID: 34918008 PMC: 8641913. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12600.


A Magnetized Brace Designed to Elevate the Extremity after Hand Trauma and Surgery.

Miller T Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(3):e3460.

PMID: 33747691 PMC: 7963490. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003460.


References
1.
Chung K, Kowalski C, Walters M . Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25(6):1038-42. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.16356. View

2.
Derlet R, Richards J, Kravitz R . Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(2):151-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01280.x. View

3.
Davison S . Emergency room coverage: an evolving crisis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(2):453-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000131885.65308.2b. View

4.
Southard P . 2003 "clarification" of controversial EMTALA requirement for 24/7 coverage of emergency departments by on-call specialists, significant impact on trauma centers. J Emerg Nurs. 2004; 30(6):582-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2004.09.013. View

5.
Rudkin S, Oman J, Langdorf M, Hill M, Bauche J, Kivela P . The state of ED on-call coverage in California. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 22(7):575-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.08.001. View