» Articles » PMID: 27651837

Epigenetic Signature of Gleason Score and Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Sep 22
PMID 27651837
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying the subset of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) at the highest risk of recurrence remains challenging, and better prognostic markers are needed. Gleason score is the best predictor of PCa aggressiveness and prognosis. In the present study, we generated an epigenetic signature based on high versus low Gleason score tumors and evaluated its ability to predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Methods: Genome-wide DNA methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; no. of patients = 333) and the elastic net method were used to generate an epigenetic signature by contrasting patients with high (8-10) versus low (≤6) Gleason score tumors. The signature was then tested in a cohort of 523 patients with clinically localized disease who had radical prostatectomy. Samples taken from the primary tumor were used for DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiling. Patients were followed for PCa recurrence on average for 8 years after diagnosis.

Results: The epigenetic signature includes 52 differentially methylated CpG sites. In the testing cohort, the signature was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio per 25 % increase = 1.78; 95 % confidence interval 1.48, 2.16). The signature significantly improved the area under the curve (AUC) for PCa recurrence compared to clinical-pathological parameters alone, particularly among patients diagnosed with Gleason score 7 tumors (0.64 vs. 0.76, P = 1.34E-4). Results were comparable for patients with Gleason 3 + 4 and those with 4 + 3 tumors. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that higher levels of the signature were associated with increased expression of genes related to cell cycle proliferation and decreased expression of androgen-responsive genes.

Conclusions: This report shows evidence that DNA methylation patterns measured in prostate tumor cells are predictive of PCa aggressiveness. The epigenetic signature may have clinical utility to improve prognostication particularly in patients with intermediate Gleason score 7 tumors.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide methylation profiling of diagnostic tumor specimens identified DNA methylation markers associated with metastasis among men with untreated localized prostate cancer.

Chao C, Slezak J, Siegmund K, Cannavale K, Shu Y, Chien G Cancer Med. 2023; 12(18):18837-18849.

PMID: 37694549 PMC: 10557825. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6507.


Methylation Subtypes of Primary Prostate Cancer Predict Poor Prognosis.

Wang X, Jordahl K, Zhu C, Livingstone J, Rhie S, Wright J Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022; 31(7):1473-1482.

PMID: 35437583 PMC: 9250603. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0007.


Signature Panel of 11 Methylated mRNAs and 3 Methylated lncRNAs for Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Cai J, Yang F, Chen X, Huang H, Miao B Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2021; 14:797-811.

PMID: 34285549 PMC: 8285280. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S312024.


DNA Methylation in Prostate Tumor Tissue Is Associated with Gleason Score.

Barry K, Mohanty K, Erickson P, Wang D, Shi J, Rose G Genes (Basel). 2020; 12(1).

PMID: 33374332 PMC: 7823928. DOI: 10.3390/genes12010012.


Epigenetic signature predicts overall survival clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Wang Y, Chen L, Ju L, Qian K, Wang X, Xiao Y Cancer Cell Int. 2020; 20(1):564.

PMID: 33292239 PMC: 7686748. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01640-x.


References
1.
Rubicz R, Zhao S, April C, Wright J, Kolb S, Coleman I . Expression of cell cycle-regulated genes and prostate cancer prognosis in a population-based cohort. Prostate. 2015; 75(13):1354-62. PMC: 4992473. DOI: 10.1002/pros.23016. View

2.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, Gillette M . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. PMC: 1239896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. View

3.
Das S, Hahn Y, Walker D, Nagata S, Willingham M, Peehl D . Topology of NGEP, a prostate-specific cell:cell junction protein widely expressed in many cancers of different grade level. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(15):6306-12. PMC: 2562772. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0870. View

4.
Cuzick J, Swanson G, Fisher G, Brothman A, Berney D, Reid J . Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(3):245-55. PMC: 3091030. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70295-3. View

5.
Nelson P, Clegg N, Arnold H, Ferguson C, Bonham M, White J . The program of androgen-responsive genes in neoplastic prostate epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(18):11890-5. PMC: 129364. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.182376299. View