» Articles » PMID: 27648708

Analysis of Computer-aided Detection Techniques and Signal Characteristics for Clustered Microcalcifications on Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2016 Sep 21
PMID 27648708
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With IRB approval, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images of human subjects were collected using a GE GEN2 DBT prototype system. Corresponding digital mammograms (DMs) of the same subjects were collected retrospectively from patient files. The data set contained a total of 237 views of DBT and equal number of DM views from 120 human subjects, each included 163 views with microcalcification clusters (MCs) and 74 views without MCs. The data set was separated into training and independent test sets. The pre-processing, object prescreening and segmentation, false positive reduction and clustering strategies for MC detection by three computer-aided detection (CADe) systems designed for DM, DBT, and a planar projection image generated from DBT were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves based on features extracted from microcalcifications and free-response ROC (FROC) curves based on scores from MCs were used to quantify the performance of the systems. Jackknife FROC (JAFROC) and non-parametric analysis methods were used to determine the statistical difference between the FROC curves. The difference between the CAD and CAD systems when the false positive rate was estimated from cases without MCs did not reach statistical significance. The study indicates that the large search space in DBT may not be a limiting factor for CADe to achieve similar performance as that observed in DM.

Citing Articles

Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs.

Mota A, Clarkson M, Almeida P, Matela N J Imaging. 2022; 8(9).

PMID: 36135397 PMC: 9503015. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging8090231.


A collection input based support tensor machine for lesion malignancy classification in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Yang B, Wu Y, Zhou Z, Li S, Qin G, Chen L Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64(23):235007.

PMID: 31698349 PMC: 7103089. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab553d.


Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets.

Samala R, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Helvie M, Richter C, Cha K IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019; 38(3):686-696.

PMID: 31622238 PMC: 6812655. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2870343.


Analysis of the Cluster Prominence Feature for Detecting Calcifications in Mammograms.

Cruz-Bernal A, Flores-Barranco M, Almanza-Ojeda D, Ledesma S, Ibarra-Manzano M J Healthc Eng. 2019; 2018:2849567.

PMID: 30687489 PMC: 6330822. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2849567.


Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.

Horvat J, Keating D, Rodrigues-Duarte H, Morris E, Mango V Radiographics. 2019; 39(2):307-318.

PMID: 30681901 PMC: 6438361. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180124.


References
1.
Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum J, Acharyya S . Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(17):1773-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. View

2.
Brem R, Hoffmeister J, Rapelyea J, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G . Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(2):439-44. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840439. View

3.
Wallis M, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M . Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology. 2012; 262(3):788-96. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11103514. View

4.
Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet J, Young K . Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study. Radiology. 2005; 237(1):37-44. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371041605. View

5.
Elter M, Horsch A . CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. Med Phys. 2009; 36(6):2052-68. DOI: 10.1118/1.3121511. View