» Articles » PMID: 27644441

Brain Strain Uncertainty Due to Shape Variation in and Simplification of Head Angular Velocity Profiles

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Sep 21
PMID 27644441
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Head angular velocity, instead of acceleration, is more predictive of brain strains. Surprisingly, no study exists that investigates how shape variation in angular velocity profiles affects brain strains, beyond characteristics such as peak magnitude and impulse duration. In this study, we evaluated brain strain uncertainty due to variation in angular velocity profiles and further compared with that resulting from simplifying the profiles into idealized shapes. To do so, we used reconstructed head impacts from American National Football League for shape extraction and simulated head uniaxial coronal rotations from onset to full stop. The velocity profiles were scaled to maintain an identical peak velocity magnitude and duration in order to isolate the shape for investigation. Element-wise peak maximum principal strains from 44 selected impacts were obtained. We found that the shape of angular velocity profile could significantly affect brain strain magnitude (e.g., percentage difference of 4.29-17.89 % in the whole brain relative to the group average, with cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) uncertainty range of 23.9 %) but not pattern (correlation coefficient of 0.94-0.99). Strain differences resulting from simplifying angular velocity profiles into idealized shapes were largely within the range due to shape variation, in both percentage difference and CSDM (signed difference of 3.91 % on average, with a typical range of 0-6 %). These findings provide important insight into the uncertainty or confidence in the performance of kinematics-based injury metrics. More importantly, they suggest the feasibility to simplify head angular velocity profiles into idealized shapes, at least within the confinements of the profiles evaluated, to enable real-time strain estimation via pre-computation in the future.

Citing Articles

Effects of anatomy and head motion on spatial patterns of deformation in the human brain.

Escarcega J, Okamoto R, Alshareef A, Johnson C, Bayly P Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; .

PMID: 39739082 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03671-1.


Peaks and Distributions of White Matter Tract-related Strains in Bicycle Helmeted Impacts: Implication for Helmet Ranking and Optimization.

Zhou Z, Fahlstedt M, Li X, Kleiven S Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(3):699-717.

PMID: 39636379 PMC: 11836146. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03653-3.


American Football On-Field Head Impact Kinematics: Influence of Acceleration Signal Characteristics on Peak Maximal Principal Strain.

Bouvette V, Petit Y, De Beaumont L, Guay S, Vinet S, Wagnac E Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(8):2134-2150.

PMID: 38758459 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03514-z.


Efficient Generation of Pretraining Samples for Developing a Deep Learning Brain Injury Model via Transfer Learning.

Lin N, Wu S, Wu Z, Ji S Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 52(10):2726-2740.

PMID: 37642795 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03354-3.


Effect of Direction and Frequency of Skull Motion on Mechanical Vulnerability of the Human Brain.

Okamoto R, Escarcega J, Alshareef A, Carass A, Prince J, Johnson C J Biomech Eng. 2023; 145(11).

PMID: 37432674 PMC: 10578077. DOI: 10.1115/1.4062937.


References
1.
Beckwith J, Greenwald R, Chu J . Measuring head kinematics in football: correlation between the head impact telemetry system and Hybrid III headform. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 40(1):237-48. PMC: 3248620. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0422-2. View

2.
Hardy W, Foster C, Mason M, Yang K, King A, Tashman S . Investigation of Head Injury Mechanisms Using Neutral Density Technology and High-Speed Biplanar X-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007; 45:337-68. DOI: 10.4271/2001-22-0016. View

3.
Ji S, Ghadyani H, Bolander R, Beckwith J, Ford J, McAllister T . Parametric comparisons of intracranial mechanical responses from three validated finite element models of the human head. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 42(1):11-24. PMC: 4397967. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0907-2. View

4.
Gabler L, Crandall J, Panzer M . Assessment of Kinematic Brain Injury Metrics for Predicting Strain Responses in Diverse Automotive Impact Conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44(12):3705-3718. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1697-0. View

5.
Yoganandan N, Li J, Zhang J, Pintar F, Gennarelli T . Influence of angular acceleration-deceleration pulse shapes on regional brain strains. J Biomech. 2008; 41(10):2253-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.019. View