» Articles » PMID: 27638671

Quality-of-Life Evaluation After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Sep 18
PMID 27638671
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases can alleviate symptoms and prolong survival at the expense of morbidity and quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to monitor QoL and outcomes before and after HIPEC.

Methods: A prospective QoL trial of patients who underwent HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. The patients completed the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy + Colon Subscale (FACT-C), the Brief Pain Inventory, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at baseline, then 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after HIPEC. The trial outcome index (TOI) was analyzed. Proportional hazards modeled the effect of baseline QoL on survival.

Results: The 598 patients (53.8 % female) in the study had a mean age of 53.3 years. The overall 1-year survival rate was 76.8 %, and the median survival period was 2.9 years. The findings showed a minor morbidity rate of 29.3 %, a major morbidity rate of 21.7 %, and a 30-day mortality rate of 3.5 %. The BPI (p < 0.0001) and worst pain (p = 0.004) increased at 3 months but returned to baseline at 6 months. After CS + HIPEC, FACT-C emotional well-being, SF-36 mental component score, and emotional health improved (all p < 0.001). Higher baseline FACT-General (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.96), FACT-C (HR, 0.73; 95 % CI 0.65-0.83), physical well-being (HR, 0.71; 95 % CI 0.64-0.78), TOI (HR, 0.87; 95 % CI 0.84-0.91), and SF-36 vitality (HR, 0.88; 95 % CI 0.83-0.92) were associated with improved survival (all p < 0.001). Higher baseline BPI (HR, 1.1; 95 % CI 1.05-1.14; p < 0.0001), worst pain (HR, 1.06; 95 % CI 1.01-1.10; p = 0.01), and ECOG (HR, 1.74; 95 % CI 1.50-2.01; p < 0.0001) were associated with worse survival.

Conclusions: Although HIPEC is associated with morbidity and detriments to QoL, recovery with good overall QoL typically occurs at or before 6 months. Baseline QoL is associated with morbidity, mortality, and survival after HIPEC.

Citing Articles

Defining a 'cells to society' research framework for appendiceal tumours.

Holowatyj A, Overman M, Votanopoulos K, Lowy A, Wagner P, Washington M Nat Rev Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 39979656 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00788-2.


Relationship between patient-reported health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12 and their mortality risk in patients with diverse cancer type: a meta-analysis.

Tanaka T, Morishita S, Nakano J, Inoue J, Okayama T, Suzuki K Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 30(2):252-266.

PMID: 39578317 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02659-0.


Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Using Open and Closed Abdomen Techniques for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases and Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma Recurrences: Results from Six French Expert Centers.

Tidadini F, Arvieux C, Glehen O, Sourrouille I, Marchal F, Abba J Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(1):209-220.

PMID: 39496899 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16407-1.


Global quality of life and mortality risk in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fukushima T, Suzuki K, Tanaka T, Okayama T, Inoue J, Morishita S Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(10):2631-2643.

PMID: 38811448 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03691-3.


Self-Reported Baseline Quality of Life Mirrors Treatment-Specific Characteristics of Cancer Patients.

Thronicke A, Oei S, Grieb G, Grabowski P, Roos J, Schad F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38136309 PMC: 10742018. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245763.


References
1.
Trask P, Hsu M, McQuellon R . Other paradigms: health-related quality of life as a measure in cancer treatment: its importance and relevance. Cancer J. 2009; 15(5):435-40. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181b9c5b9. View

2.
Shen P, Levine E, Hall J, Case D, Russell G, Fleming R . Factors predicting survival after intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy with mitomycin C after cytoreductive surgery for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Arch Surg. 2003; 138(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.26. View

3.
Kusamura S, Younan R, Baratti D, Costanzo P, Favaro M, Gavazzi C . Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion: analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique. Cancer. 2006; 106(5):1144-53. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21708. View

4.
Cunningham A, Phillips C, Stephen J, Edmonds C . Fighting for life: a qualitative analysis of the process of psychotherapy-assisted self-help in patients with metastatic cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2003; 1(2):146-61. DOI: 10.1177/1534735402001002006. View

5.
Feldman A, Libutti S, Pingpank J, Bartlett D, Beresnev T, Mavroukakis S . Analysis of factors associated with outcome in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma undergoing surgical debulking and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(24):4560-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.150. View