» Articles » PMID: 27637908

Utilization of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Practice and Focal Therapy: Report from a Delphi Consensus Project

Abstract

Purpose: To codify the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the interrogation of prostate neoplasia (PCa) in clinical practice and focal therapy (FT).

Methods: An international collaborative consensus project was undertaken using the Delphi method among experts in the field of PCa. An online questionnaire was presented in three consecutive rounds and modified each round based on the comments provided by the experts. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to discuss and finalize the consensus results.

Results: mpMRI should be performed in patients with prior negative biopsies if clinical suspicion remains, but not instead of the PSA test, nor as a stand-alone diagnostic tool or mpMRI-targeted biopsies only. It is not recommended to use a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner without an endorectal or pelvic phased-array coil. mpMRI should be performed following standard biopsy-based PCa diagnosis in both the planning and follow-up of FT. If a lesion is seen, MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies should be performed for FT planning. Systematic biopsies are still required for FT planning in biopsy-naïve patients and for patients with residual PCa after FT. Standard repeat biopsies should be taken during the follow-up of FT. The final decision to perform FT should be based on histopathology. However, these consensus statements may differ for expert centers versus non-expert centers.

Conclusions: The mpMRI is an important tool for characterizing and targeting PCa in clinical practice and FT. Standardization of acquisition and reading should be the main priority to guarantee consistent mpMRI quality throughout the urological community.

Citing Articles

Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tay K, Fong K, Stabile A, Dominguez-Escrig J, Ukimura O, Rodriguez-Sanchez L Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 39468217 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00911-2.


Identifying the best candidate for focal therapy: a comprehensive review.

Ghoreifi A, Gomella L, Hu J, Konety B, Lunelli L, Rastinehad A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 39443815 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00907-y.


Prospective close monitoring of the effect of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy and high intensity focused ultrasound of localized prostate cancer by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Solyanik O, Chaloupka M, Clevert D, Schmidt V, Ingenerf M, Kazmierczak P World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):462.

PMID: 39088086 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05143-6.


"Seeing Is Believing": Additive Utility of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Chin J, Tan Y, Lee A, Ng T, Shi R, Tang C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730729 PMC: 11083035. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091777.


Focal cryotherapy for prostate cancer: a contemporary literature review.

Kotamarti S, Polascik T Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(1):26.

PMID: 36760265 PMC: 9906190. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5033.


References
1.
Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D, Leroy X, Ballereau C, Lemaitre L . Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol. 2006; 176(6 Pt 1):2432-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.007. View

2.
Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Yamashita T, Egashira N . Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology. 2008; 248(2):531-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482070157. View

3.
Rouviere O, Girouin N, Glas L, Cheikh A, Gelet A, Mege-Lechevallier F . Prostate cancer transrectal HIFU ablation: detection of local recurrences using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 2009; 20(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1520-5. View

4.
Turkbey B, Mani H, Shah V, Rastinehad A, Bernardo M, Pohida T . Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol. 2011; 186(5):1818-24. PMC: 5540658. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.013. View

5.
Rosenkrantz A, Deng F, Kim S, Lim R, Hindman N, Mussi T . Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization--a multiple-reader study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(4):830-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8446. View