» Articles » PMID: 27633495

Nonlethal Predator Effects on the Turn-over of Wild Bird Flocks

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Sep 17
PMID 27633495
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonlethal predator effects arise when individuals of a prey species adjust their behaviour due to the presence of predators. Non-lethal predator effects have been shown to affect social group structure and social behaviour as well as individual fitness of the prey. In this experimental study, we used model sparrowhawks to launch attacks on flocks of wild great tits and blue tits whilst monitoring their social dynamics. We show that nonlethal attacks caused instantaneous turn-over and mixing of group composition within foraging flocks. A single experimental 'attack' lasting on average less than three seconds, caused the amount of turn-over expected over three hours (2.0-3.8 hours) of undisturbed foraging. This suggests that nonlethal predator effects can greatly alter group composition within populations, with potential implications for social behaviour by increasing the number of potential interaction partners, as well as longer-term consequences for pair formation and emergent effects determined by social structure such as information and disease transmission. We provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, based on in depth monitoring of a social network to comprehensively support the hypothesis that predators influence the social structure of groups, which offers new perspectives on the key drivers of social behaviour in wild populations.

Citing Articles

Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions.

Chan A, Dunning J, Beck K, Burke T, Chik H, Dunleavy D Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2025; 79(2):26.

PMID: 39927187 PMC: 11802709. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7.


The relationship between nest location selection of Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and human activity and residence.

Kim M, Chung O, Lee J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):23008.

PMID: 38155232 PMC: 10754929. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50149-6.


Development under predation risk increases serotonin-signaling, variability of turning behavior and survival in adult fruit flies .

Krama T, Munkevics M, Krams R, Grigorjeva T, Trakimas G, Joers P Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1189301.

PMID: 37304760 PMC: 10248140. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1189301.


Social learning of acoustic anti-predator cues occurs between wild bird species.

Keen S, Cole E, Sheehan M, Sheldon B Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1920):20192513.

PMID: 32075532 PMC: 7031672. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2513.


Programmable Automated System for Songbird Ecobehavioral Research (PASSER): Using flexible computer-integrated feeders to conduct high resolution studies of environment-behavior dynamics in songbirds.

Philson C, Ray A, Foltz S, Davis J Ecol Evol. 2019; 8(24):12522-12532.

PMID: 30619562 PMC: 6308886. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4638.


References
1.
Gentle L, Gosler A . Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1466):487-91. PMC: 1088631. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1405. View

2.
Creel S, Christianson D . Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(4):194-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004. View

3.
Boukal D, Berec L, Krivan V . Does sex-selective predation stabilize or destabilize predator-prey dynamics?. PLoS One. 2008; 3(7):e2687. PMC: 2444021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002687. View

4.
Quinn J, Cole E, Bates J, Payne R, Cresswell W . Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 279(1735):1919-26. PMC: 3311888. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2227. View

5.
Broom M, Voelkl B . Two measures of effective population size for graphs. Evolution. 2012; 66(5):1613-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01528.x. View