» Articles » PMID: 27633101

Development of Putative Probiotics As Feed Additives: Validation in a Porcine-specific Gastrointestinal Tract Model

Overview
Date 2016 Sep 17
PMID 27633101
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enforced restrictions on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters (AGPs) in animal production have prompted investigations into alternative feed additives in recent decades. Probiotics are currently the main feed additive used in livestock. However, the selection of probiotic candidates relies on human-based methods and little is known about the verification criteria for host-specific selection. We investigated the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus salivarius strains isolated from fed pig feces for their use as porcine feed additives. Two methods were developed that simulated the pig gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the intestinal epithelium, and these were compared with human-based in vitro methods and used for selecting porcine probiotics. Lactobacillus salivarius strain LS6 was identified as a promising probiotic strain for potential use as a porcine feed additive. This strain prevented disruption of the epithelial integrity of pig small intestine (PSI) cells by inhibiting the adherence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. It also showed high survival rates in the in vitro pig GI tract model and good adhesion to PSI cells. We propose that host target-specific screening and validation methods are important tools in the development of effective probiotic feed additives, and this approach may support future-oriented agriculture.

Citing Articles

Probiotic bacteria of wild boar origin intended for piglets - An study.

Kostovova I, Kavanova K, Moravkova M, Gebauer J, Leva L, Vicenova M Vet Med (Praha). 2024; 69(8):281-296.

PMID: 39296628 PMC: 11406499. DOI: 10.17221/35/2024-VETMED.


Targeted Screening from Highly Colitis-Resistant Pigs Can Alleviate Ulcerative Colitis in Mice.

Fang X, Liu H, Du Y, Jiang L, Gao F, Wang Z Research (Wash D C). 2024; 7:0415.

PMID: 39015206 PMC: 11249912. DOI: 10.34133/research.0415.


Impact of Long-Term Supplementation with Probiotics on Gut Microbiota and Growth Performance in Post-Weaned Piglets.

Park S, Kim Y, Kim S, Han J Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891699 PMC: 11171352. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111652.


Whole-genome sequencing of Pseudoalteromonas piscicida 2515 revealed its antibacterial potency against Vibrio anguillarum: a preliminary invitro study.

Wang F, Ghonimy A, Wang X Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2024; 117(1):84.

PMID: 38809302 DOI: 10.1007/s10482-024-01974-w.


Characterization of feline-originated probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus CACC612 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CACC789 and and evaluation of their host response.

Jang H, Kim J, Kim Y BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):128.

PMID: 38561808 PMC: 10983674. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03975-3.


References
1.
Yang F, Hou C, Zeng X, Qiao S . The use of lactic Acid bacteria as a probiotic in Swine diets. Pathogens. 2015; 4(1):34-45. PMC: 4384071. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens4010034. View

2.
Ashida H, Ogawa M, Kim M, Mimuro H, Sasakawa C . Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier. Nat Chem Biol. 2011; 8(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.741. View

3.
Oomen A, Rompelberg C, Bruil M, Dobbe C, Pereboom D, Sips A . Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003; 44(3):281-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-002-1278-0. View

4.
Pluske J . Feed- and feed additives-related aspects of gut health and development in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 4(1):1. PMC: 3623743. DOI: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-1. View

5.
Kararli T . Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995; 16(5):351-80. DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2510160502. View