» Articles » PMID: 27632215

A Multicenter, 12-month Randomized Study Comparing Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant with Ranibizumab in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Sep 16
PMID 27632215
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) 0.7 mg every 5 months provides a similar average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline as ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered as per its European Summary of Product Characteristics in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, 12-month, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority study in patients with DME (one eye/patient). The primary efficacy measure was BCVA using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. Secondary efficacy measures included area of leakage on fluorescein angiography and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography.

Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups (DEX implant, n = 181; ranibizumab, n = 182); mean DME duration was ∼33 months. The mean average BCVA change from baseline over 12 months was 4.34 letters with DEX implant and 7.60 letters with ranibizumab. The lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval of the between-group difference was -4.74 letters, and therefore, DEX was demonstrated to be noninferior to ranibizumab based on the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5 letters. At monthly follow-up visits, the percentage of patients with ≥15-letter BCVA gain from baseline ranged from 7.2 to 17.7 % with DEX implant and 4.4 to 26.9 % with ranibizumab. Both DEX implant and ranibizumab effectively reduced CRT and reduced the area of fluorescein leakage. Between-group differences in change from baseline CRT favored DEX implant at 1, 2, 6, and 7 months (p ≤ 0.007) and ranibizumab at 4, 5, 9, and 10 months (p < 0.001); the decrease in fluorescein leakage area was greater with DEX implant than ranibizumab at month 12 (p < 0.001). Ocular adverse events in the study eye were more frequent in the DEX implant group because of the occurrence of intraocular pressure (IOP) increases and cataract. IOP increases were transient and generally managed with topical medication.

Conclusions: Both DEX implant and ranibizumab were well tolerated and improved BCVA and anatomic outcomes in patients with DME. DEX implant met the a priori criterion for noninferiority to ranibizumab in average change from baseline BCVA over 12 months. Noninferiority was achieved with an average of 2.85 DEX implant injections and 8.70 ranibizumab injections per patient.

Citing Articles

Short-Term Safety and Efficacy of PreserFlo™ Microshunt in Patients with Refractory Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Dexamethasone Implant Intravitreal Injection.

Bourauel L, Petrak M, Holz F, Mercieca K, Weber C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860513 PMC: 11765877. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020507.


Comparative assessment of intravitreal steroid implant with combination therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Agrawal S, Ramanjulu R, Shanmugam P, Havanje A Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(11):1674-1676.

PMID: 39462931 PMC: 11668226. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3024_22.


Comparison of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and dexamethasone implant monotherapy in treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema: A 12-month real-life experience.

Parca O, Cetin E Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(Suppl 3):S453-S458.

PMID: 38648453 PMC: 467021. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2310_23.


The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When.

Salvetat M, Pellegrini F, Spadea L, Salati C, Musa M, Gagliano C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592149 PMC: 10932454. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051327.


Comparing the efficacy of glucocorticoids and anti-VEGF in treating diabetic macular edema: systematic review and comprehensive analysis.

Cheng Z, Liu X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1342530.

PMID: 38586457 PMC: 10995385. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1342530.


References
1.
Jain A, Varshney N, Smith C . The evolving treatment options for diabetic macular edema. Int J Inflam. 2013; 2013:689276. PMC: 3782842. DOI: 10.1155/2013/689276. View

2.
Totan Y, Guler E, Guragac F . Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Treatment. Curr Eye Res. 2015; 41(1):107-13. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.1002048. View

3.
Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang G, Massin P, Schlingemann R . The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(4):615-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.031. View

4.
Augustin A, Kuppermann B, Lanzetta P, Loewenstein A, Li X, Cui H . Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: subgroup analysis of the MEAD study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15:150. PMC: 4628378. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0148-2. View

5.
Khurana R, Appa S, McCannel C, Elman M, Wittenberg S, Parks D . Dexamethasone implant anterior chamber migration: risk factors, complications, and management strategies. Ophthalmology. 2013; 121(1):67-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.033. View