» Articles » PMID: 27631081

Retrospective Multicenter Study on Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections After Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis

Overview
Journal Dig Surg
Date 2016 Sep 16
PMID 27631081
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are seen in up to 5% of patients after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. SSI are associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased costs. The aim of this multicenter study was to identify factors associated with SSI after appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Methods: Patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between June 2014 and January 2015 in 6 teaching hospitals in the southwest of the Netherlands were included. Patient, diagnostic, intra-operative and disease-related factors were collected from the patients' charts. Primary outcome was surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for SSI.

Results: Some 637 patients were included. Forty-two patients developed a SSI. In univariable analysis body temperature >38°C, CRP>65 and complex appendicitis were associated with SSI. After multivariable logistic regression with stepwise backwards elimination, complex appendicitis was significantly associated with SSI (OR 4.09; 95% CI 2.04-8.20). Appendiceal stump closure with a stapler device was inversely correlated with SSI (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.97) Conclusions: Complex appendicitis is a risk factor for SSI and warrants close monitoring postoperatively. The use of a stapler device for appendiceal stump closure is associated with a reduced risk of SSI.

Citing Articles

Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.

Williams-Reid H, Johannesson A, Buis A Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025; 7(2):43716.

PMID: 39990247 PMC: 11844764. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716.


Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 1 - A scoping review of healing and non-healing definitions.

Williams-Reid H, Johannesson A, Buis A Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025; 7(2):43715.

PMID: 39990241 PMC: 11844765. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43715.


Surgical site infection following appendectomy in children.

Azmeraw M, Temesgen D, Kitaw T, Feleke S, Haile R, Kassaw A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6321.

PMID: 39984478 PMC: 11845603. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79939-2.


Construction of a clinical prediction model for complicated appendicitis based on machine learning techniques.

Wei W, Tongping S, Jiaming W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16473.

PMID: 39013966 PMC: 11252286. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67453-4.


Postoperative Antibiotics and Time to Reach Discharge Criteria after Appendectomy for Complex Appendicitis.

van den Boom A, de Wijkerslooth E, Giesen L, van Rossem C, Toorenvliet B, Wijnhoven B Dig Surg. 2022; 39(4):162-168.

PMID: 36041400 PMC: 9909712. DOI: 10.1159/000526790.


References
1.
Sawyer R, Claridge J, Nathens A, Rotstein O, Duane T, Evans H . Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(21):1996-2005. PMC: 4469182. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162. View

2.
Kelly K, Fleming F, Aquina C, Probst C, Noyes K, Pegoli W . Disease severity, not operative approach, drives organ space infection after pediatric appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2014; 260(3):466-71. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000874. View

3.
Cheng Y, Zhou S, Zhou R, Lu J, Wu S, Xiong X . Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (2):CD010168. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub2. View

4.
Bakker O, Go P, Puylaert J, Kazemier G, Heij H . [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010; 154:A303. View

5.
van den Boom A, Gorter R, van Haard P, Doornebosch P, Heij H, Dawson I . The impact of disease severity, age and surgical approach on the outcome of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015; 31(4):339-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3677-0. View