» Articles » PMID: 27609725

Inappropriate Use of Commercial Antinuclear Antibody Testing in a Community-based US Hospital: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Date 2016 Sep 10
PMID 27609725
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Healthcare providers use antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) to screen and diagnose patients with autoimmune diseases. In the recent years, commercial multiplex ANA kits have emerged as a convenient and fast diagnostic method. Diagnostic testing should follow sequenced algorithms: initial screen followed by specific antibody analysis. Second-level testing as an initial screen for autoimmune disease is inappropriate. We reviewed 68 patients with ANA comprehensive panels over a 6-month period from May 2015 to October 2015. We assessed appropriateness and estimated incurred losses from inappropriate testing. We found 92.6% (63 out of 68) of the ANA comprehensive panel results to be negative. Incurred losses from inappropriate ANA comprehensive panel testing were $66,000. Physicians should become familiar with ANA-sequenced diagnostic algorithms to avoid unnecessary higher level testing.

Citing Articles

Reliability and reproducibility of antinuclear antibody testing in pediatric rheumatology practice.

Ostrov B Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 9:1071115.

PMID: 36714114 PMC: 9875300. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1071115.


Frequency of repeat antinuclear antibody testing in Ontario: a population-based descriptive study.

Lake S, Yao Z, Gakhal N, Steiman A, Hawker G, Widdifield J CMAJ Open. 2020; 8(1):E184-E190.

PMID: 32184282 PMC: 7082105. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190148.

References
1.
Rouquette A, Desgruelles C . Detection of antibodies to dsDNA: an overview of laboratory assays. Lupus. 2006; 15(7):403-7. DOI: 10.1191/0961203306lu2324oa. View

2.
Suresh E . Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis for the non-specialist. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2007; 68(10):538-41. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2007.68.10.27324. View

3.
Elshal M, McCoy J . Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA. Methods. 2006; 38(4):317-23. PMC: 1534009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010. View

4.
Volkmann E, Taylor M, Ben-Artzi A . Using the antinuclear antibody test to diagnose rheumatic diseases: when does a positive test warrant further investigation?. South Med J. 2012; 105(2):100-4. DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31824551a1. View

5.
Kumar Y, Bhatia A, Minz R . Antinuclear antibodies and their detection methods in diagnosis of connective tissue diseases: a journey revisited. Diagn Pathol. 2009; 4:1. PMC: 2628865. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-4-1. View