» Articles » PMID: 27607465

Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk Following Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia on Needle Biopsy

Overview
Journal JAMA Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Sep 9
PMID 27607465
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a known risk factor for breast cancer. Published risk estimates are based on cohorts that included women whose ADH was diagnosed before widespread use of screening mammograms and did not differentiate between the methods used to diagnose ADH, which may be related to the size of the ADH focus. These risks may overestimate the risk in women with presently diagnosed ADH.

Objective: To examine the risk of invasive cancer associated with ADH diagnosed using core needle biopsy vs excisional biopsy.

Design: A cohort study was conducted comparing the 10-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer in 955 331 women undergoing mammography with and without a diagnosis of ADH. Data were obtained from 5 breast imaging registries that participate in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Exposures: Diagnosis of ADH on core needle biopsy or excisional biopsy in women undergoing mammography.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Ten-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer.

Results: The sample included 955 331 women with 1727 diagnoses of ADH, 1058 (61.3%) of which were diagnosed by core biopsy and 635 (36.8%) by excisional biopsy. The mean (interquartile range) age of the women at diagnosis was 52.6 (46.9-60.4) years. From 1996 to 2012, the proportion of ADH diagnosed by core needle biopsy increased from 21% to 77%. Ten years following a diagnosis of ADH, the cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0-3.4) times higher than the risk in women with no ADH. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed via excisional biopsy was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.0 (95% CI, 2-4.5) and, via core needle biopsy, with an adjusted HR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.4). Ten years after an ADH diagnosis, an estimated 5.7% (95% CI, 4.3%-10.1%) of the women had a diagnosis of invasive cancer. Women with ADH diagnosed on excisional biopsy had a slightly higher risk (6.7%; 95% CI, 3.0%-12.8%) compared with those with ADH diagnosed via core needle biopsy (5%; 95% CI, 2.2%-8.9%).

Conclusions And Relevance: Current 10-year risks of invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ADH may be lower than those previously reported. The risk associated with ADH is slightly lower for women whose ADH was diagnosed by needle core biopsy compared with excisional biopsy.

Citing Articles

Trends in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosis and Upgrade: A 20-Year Experience and Impact of MRI Use on Upgrade Rates.

Zaveri S, Sun S, Zaghloul T, Bevers T, Albarracin C, Patel M Ann Surg Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39875718 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-16933-6.


Long term follow-up of women treated for screen detected atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia in a large UK screening centre.

Brown N, Pritchard S, Harkness E, Lim Y, Gandhi A, Evans D BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):90.

PMID: 39695332 PMC: 11655829. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00113-2.


Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up.

Dalton J, Thomas S, Chiba A, Wang T, Hwang E, Plichta J Am J Surg. 2024; 239:115993.

PMID: 39368939 PMC: 11835510. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115993.


Participation in a High-Risk Program Is Associated with a Diagnosis of Earlier-Stage Disease Among Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer Development.

Pilewskie M, Eroglu I, Sevilimedu V, Le T, Mangino D, Morrow M Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6764-6773.

PMID: 38949720 PMC: 11605954. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15633-x.


Recommendations for breast cancer screening in Brazil, from the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, the Brazilian Society of Mastology, and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations.

Urban L, Chala L, de Paula I, Bauab S, Schaefer M, Oliveira A Radiol Bras. 2023; 56(4):207-214.

PMID: 37829583 PMC: 10567087. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0064-en.


References
1.
Whiffen A, El-Tamer M, Taback B, Feldman S, Joseph K . Predictors of breast cancer development in women with atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical lobular hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 18(2):463-7. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1340-5. View

2.
Carter C, Corle D, Micozzi M, Schatzkin A, Taylor P . A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 128(3):467-77. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114995. View

3.
Dupont W, Page D . Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312(3):146-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198501173120303. View

4.
Worsham M, Raju U, Lu M, Kapke A, Botttrell A, Cheng J . Risk factors for breast cancer from benign breast disease in a diverse population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 118(1):1-7. PMC: 3715322. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0198-8. View

5.
Tice J, OMeara E, Weaver D, Vachon C, Ballard-Barbash R, Kerlikowske K . Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105(14):1043-9. PMC: 3714021. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt124. View