» Articles » PMID: 27605877

Metabolic Complications in Liver Transplant Recipients

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 Sep 9
PMID 27605877
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The metabolic syndrome (MS), which includes obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and hyperglycaemia according to the most widely accepted definitions now used, is one of the most common post-transplant complications, with a prevalence of 44%-58%. The MS, together with the immunosuppression, is considered the main risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients, which in turn accounts for 19%-42% of all deaths unrelated to the graft. The presence of MS represents a relative risk for the development of CVD and death of 1.78. On the other hand, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), considered as the manifestation of the MS in the liver, is now the second leading reason for liver transplantation in the United States after hepatitis C and alcohol. NAFLD has a high rate of recurrence in the liver graft and a direct relation with the worsening of other metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance or diabetes mellitus. Consequently, it is vitally important to identify and treat as soon as possible such modifiable factors as hypertension, overweight, hyperlipidaemia or diabetes in transplanted patients to thus minimise the impact on patient survival. Additionally, steroid-free regimens are favoured, with minimal immunosuppression to limit the possible effects on the development of the MS.

Citing Articles

Post liver transplant metabolic syndrome: Frequency, predictors and outcome.

Rahim Z, Malik K, Sarwar S, Salim A Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(2):531-535.

PMID: 39926670 PMC: 11803791. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.10774.


Key challenges of post-liver transplant weight management.

Cigrovski Berkovic M, Sesa V, Balen I, Lai Q, Silovski H, Mrzljak A World J Transplant. 2024; 14(4):95033.

PMID: 39697459 PMC: 11438933. DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.95033.


Overweight Impacts Histological Disease Activity of De Novo Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease After Liver Transplantation.

Campos-Murguia A, Guetzlaff L, Bosselmann E, Engel B, Hartleben B, Wedemeyer H Clin Transplant. 2024; 38(11):e70039.

PMID: 39575514 PMC: 11582943. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70039.


Integration of perioperative features and intragraft TCF7L2 expression to predict lipid metabolic disorder in liver transplant recipients.

Zhou J, Wei R, Fan G, Lian Z, Zhang X, Tang L Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 68(1):297-299.

PMID: 39499443 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-024-2590-x.


Changes in Pancreas Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.

Brown C, Ray C, Kuketz G, Virostko J Transplantation. 2024; 108(10):e313-e320.

PMID: 38637920 PMC: 11424270. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005031.


References
1.
Yadav A, Chang Y, Aqel B, Byrne T, Chakkera H, Douglas D . New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Database. J Transplant. 2013; 2013:269096. PMC: 3800575. DOI: 10.1155/2013/269096. View

2.
Perseghin G, Mazzaferro V, Sereni L, Regalia E, Benedini S, Bazzigaluppi E . Contribution of reduced insulin sensitivity and secretion to the pathogenesis of hepatogenous diabetes: effect of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2000; 31(3):694-703. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510310320. View

3.
Stegall M, Everson G, SCHROTER G, Karrer F, Bilir B, Sternberg T . Prednisone withdrawal late after adult liver transplantation reduces diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia without causing graft loss. Hepatology. 1997; 25(1):173-7. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510250132. View

4.
Martinez-Saldivar B, Prieto J, Berenguer M, Mata M, Pons J, Serrano T . Control of blood pressure in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2012; 93(10):1031-7. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31824cd5e6. View

5.
Everhart J, Lombardero M, Lake J, Wiesner R, Zetterman R, Hoofnagle J . Weight change and obesity after liver transplantation: incidence and risk factors. Liver Transpl Surg. 1998; 4(4):285-96. DOI: 10.1002/lt.500040402. View