» Articles » PMID: 27604810

Joint Modelling of Time-to-event and Multivariate Longitudinal Outcomes: Recent Developments and Issues

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Sep 9
PMID 27604810
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Available methods for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event outcomes have typically only allowed for a single longitudinal outcome and a solitary event time. In practice, clinical studies are likely to record multiple longitudinal outcomes. Incorporating all sources of data will improve the predictive capability of any model and lead to more informative inferences for the purpose of medical decision-making.

Methods: We reviewed current methodologies of joint modelling for time-to-event data and multivariate longitudinal data including the distributional and modelling assumptions, the association structures, estimation approaches, software tools for implementation and clinical applications of the methodologies.

Results: We found that a large number of different models have recently been proposed. Most considered jointly modelling linear mixed models with proportional hazard models, with correlation between multiple longitudinal outcomes accounted for through multivariate normally distributed random effects. So-called current value and random effects parameterisations are commonly used to link the models. Despite developments, software is still lacking, which has translated into limited uptake by medical researchers.

Conclusion: Although, in an era of personalized medicine, the value of multivariate joint modelling has been established, researchers are currently limited in their ability to fit these models routinely. We make a series of recommendations for future research needs.

Citing Articles

A comparative study of methods for dynamic survival analysis.

de Swart W, Loog M, Krijthe J Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1504535.

PMID: 40040908 PMC: 11876041. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1504535.


Multivariate Joint Analysis of Blood Pressure Measurements and Time to Remission: A Case Study of Hypertensive Patients Receiving Treatment at Jimma University Medical Center.

Akasa J, Wondaya S, Befikadu S J Res Health Sci. 2025; 25(1):e00637.

PMID: 39996346 PMC: 11833497. DOI: 10.34172/jrhs.2025.172.


Joint modelling of longitudinal data: a scoping review of methodology and applications for non-time to event data.

Ouko R, Mukaka M, Ohuma E BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):40.

PMID: 39962370 PMC: 11831847. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-025-02485-6.


A Bayesian Joint Model of Multiple Nonlinear Longitudinal and Competing Risks Outcomes for Dynamic Prediction in Multiple Myeloma: Joint Estimation and Corrected Two-Stage Approaches.

Alvares D, Barrett J, Mercier F, Roumpanis S, Yiu S, Castro F Stat Med. 2025; 44(3-4):e10322.

PMID: 39865588 PMC: 11771571. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10322.


Dynamic survival prediction of end-stage kidney disease using random survival forests for competing risk analysis.

Christiadi D, Chai K, Chuah A, Loong B, Andrews T, Chakera A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1428073.

PMID: 39722823 PMC: 11668785. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1428073.


References
1.
Xu J, Zeger S . The evaluation of multiple surrogate endpoints. Biometrics. 2001; 57(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00081.x. View

2.
Wang C, Douglas J, Anderson S . Item response models for joint analysis of quality of life and survival. Stat Med. 2002; 21(1):129-42. DOI: 10.1002/sim.989. View

3.
Dupuy J, Mesbah M . Joint modeling of event time and nonignorable missing longitudinal data. Lifetime Data Anal. 2002; 8(2):99-115. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014871806118. View

4.
Lin H, McCulloch C, Mayne S . Maximum likelihood estimation in the joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple longitudinal variables. Stat Med. 2002; 21(16):2369-82. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1179. View

5.
Royston P, Parmar M . Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med. 2002; 21(15):2175-97. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1203. View