A Survey on Awareness of Genetic Counseling for Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: the First Year Experience in Japan

The purpose of this study is to summarize the results from a survey on awareness of genetic counseling for pregnant women who wish to receive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan. As a component of a clinical study by the Japan NIPT Consortium, genetic counseling was conducted for women who wished to receive NIPT, and a questionnaire concerning both NIPT and genetic counseling was given twice: once after pre-test counseling and again when test results were reported. The responses of 7292 women were analyzed. They expressed high satisfaction with the genetic counseling system of the NIPT Consortium (94%). The number of respondents who indicated that genetic counseling is necessary for NIPT increased over time. Furthermore, they highly valued genetic counseling provided by skilled clinicians, such as clinical geneticists or genetic counselors. The vast majority (90%) responded that there was sufficient opportunity to consider the test ahead of time. Meanwhile, women who received positive test results had a poor opinion and expressed a low-degree satisfaction. We confirmed that the pre-test genetic counseling that we conducted creates an opportunity for pregnant women to sufficiently consider prenatal testing, promotes its understanding and has possibilities to effectively facilitate informed decision making after adequate consideration. A more careful and thorough approach is considered to be necessary for women who received positive test results.

Citing Articles

Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.

Ogawa M, Hasuo Y, Taura Y, Tsunematsu R, Shikada S, Matsushita Y J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021; 47(11):3813-3820.

PMID: 34490692 PMC: 9292293. DOI: 10.1111/jog.15010.

Institutional and Social Issues Surrounding Genetic Counselors in Japan: Current Challenges and Implications for the Global Community.

Aizawa Y, Watanabe A, Kato K Front Genet. 2021; 12:646177.

PMID: 33927749 PMC: 8076856. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.646177.

Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia: The Role of Exosomes.

Matsubara K, Matsubara Y, Uchikura Y, Sugiyama T Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(5).

PMID: 33806480 PMC: 7961527. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052572.

The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study.

Zhu W, Ling X, Shang W, Huang J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(19).

PMID: 33008137 PMC: 7579635. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197187.

Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing.

Yotsumoto J, Sekizawa A, Inoue S, Suzumori N, Samura O, Yamada T BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):112.

PMID: 32066398 PMC: 7027219. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-2763-z.

References

Godino L, Pompilii E, DAnna F, Morselli-Labate A, Nardi E, Seri M . Attitudes of women of advanced maternal age undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis and the impact of genetic counselling. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015; 24(3):331-7. PMC: 4755368. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.116. View

Pletcher B, Jewett E, Cull W, Brotherton S, Hoyme H, Pan R . The practice of clinical genetics: a survey of practitioners. Genet Med. 2002; 4(3):142-9. DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200205000-00008. View

Alexander E, Kelly S, Kerzin-Storrar L . Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives. J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(2):300-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9765-9. View

Wilson K, Czerwinski J, Hoskovec J, Noblin S, Sullivan C, Harbison A . NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy. J Genet Couns. 2012; 22(1):4-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9545-3. View

Cooksey J, Forte G, Benkendorf J, Blitzer M . The state of the medical geneticist workforce: findings of the 2003 survey of American Board of Medical Genetics certified geneticists. Genet Med. 2005; 7(6):439-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000172416.35285.9f. View

Wax J, Cartin A, Chard R, Lucas F, Pinette M . Noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and trisomy 21 detection. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014; 43(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22243. View

Mennuti M, Cherry A, Morrissette J, Dugoff L . Is it time to sound an alarm about false-positive cell-free DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209(5):415-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.027. View

Buchanan A, Sachs A, Toler T, Tsipis J . NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34(9):850-7. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4382. View

Tiller G, Kershberg H, Goff J, Coffeen C, Liao W, Sehnert A . Women's views and the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on procedures in a managed care setting. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 35(5):428-33. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4495. View

10.

Yotsumoto J, Sekizawa A, Koide K, Purwosunu Y, Ichizuka K, Matsuoka R . Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(7):674-9. DOI: 10.1002/pd.3886. View

11.

Farrelly E, Cho M, Erby L, Roter D, Stenzel A, Ormond K . Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability?. J Genet Couns. 2012; 21(6):814-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9484-z. View

12.

Hertig S, Cavalli S, Burton-Jeangros C, Elger B . 'Doctor, what would you do in my position?' Health professionals and the decision-making process in pregnancy monitoring. J Med Ethics. 2013; 40(5):310-4. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100887. View

13.

McPherson E, Zaleski C, Benishek K, McCarty C, Giampietro P, Reynolds K . Clinical genetics provider real-time workflow study. Genet Med. 2008; 10(9):699-706. DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318182206f. View

14.

Chervenak F, McCullough L . Ethical issues in perinatal genetics. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 16(2):70-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2010.10.004. View

15.

Bernhardt B, Tumpson J, Pyeritz R . The economics of clinical genetics services. IV. Financial impact of outpatient genetic services on an academic institution. Am J Hum Genet. 1992; 50(1):84-91. PMC: 1682524. View

16.

Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, DAntonio F . Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 45(1):16-26. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14636. View

17.

Tabor A, Alfirevic Z . Update on procedure-related risks for prenatal diagnosis techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1159/000271995. View

18.

Sago H, Sekizawa A . Nationwide demonstration project of next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma in Japan: 1-year experience. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 35(4):331-6. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4539. View

19.

Gregg A, Gross S, Best R, Monaghan K, Bajaj K, Skotko B . ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med. 2013; 15(5):395-8. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.29. View

20.

Sukenik-Halevy R, Ludman M, Ben-Shachar S, Raas-Rothschild A . The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing. Genet Med. 2015; 18(4):372-7. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.96. View